Garnet And Black Attack: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

5 POINTS: Born to Run ... or Not -- LSU 24, South Carolina 17

Fivepoints2008sat_medium
1. 39 yards. If you want to know why the Gamecocks lost this game, it's all wrapped up in that number: 39 yards. As in, South Carolina's rushing total Saturday night. When you take out Stephen Garcia's numbers, it gets even worse: Mike Davis, Eric Baker and Bobby Wallace combined for 24 yards. If you think anyone can win with those kinds of rushing numbers -- well, you're delusional.

By way of comparison, 2007 Texas Tech -- by all accounts a decent team that relied almost entirely on the pass -- average 59.3 ypg. Hawaii last year? 72.6 ypg. If you can't even gain 50 yards on the ground, you're going to lose, unless you're playign an opponent whose defensive coordinator is an idiot.

To say that Spurrier's offense is a passing attack misses the point. (Errict Rhett, for example, led the SEC in rushing two of the four years he played for Spurrier.) You have to have a running game, or the defense can do exactly what LSU did Saturday night -- blitz or find other creative ways to put pressure on the quarterback.

Or don't, really, since the offensive line couldn't do much pass protection even when LSU was doing some pretty vanilla things up front. Garcia was sacked six times, and his mobility saved him from the same fate a few other times.

Garciasits_medium
When you can't run, this happens.

Yes, Garcia gave up and took off running too early on some plays, but that didn't hurt the rushing numbers, and all it really did was ensure that LSU was always ready for the run even when they weren't afraid of it.

2. Garcia's the guy. Not that it much matters what I think, since Head Ball Coach has already said Garcia will start, but it's the right call. Whatever you think of some of the youthful mistakes Garcia made -- and there were some -- the reason to keep Garcia in there is wrapped up in the Spurrier quote that Mike Patrick and Todd Blackledge kept using: "He gives us hope."


PassingRushingSacks
GRatingCompAttPctYdsY/GY/ATDINTRushYdsY/GAvgTDSackYdsL
2008 - Stephen Garcia 4 141.2 37 61 60.7 515 128.8 13.9 3 2 45 124 31.0 2.8 1 - -


We've seen the ceiling with Chris Smelley, and nothing against the guy, but he's a good backup and not a season-long starter. Garcia reminded us Saturday that there will be some bumps in the road -- but, with him, there's hope.

3. Fixing Succop. It's hard to say just how much Ryan Succop's missed field goal in the second quarter affected this game. On the one hand, South Carolina lost by a touchdown and the ensuing LSU drive, which ended in a touchdown, started on their own 22, about where it would have following a potential touchback. On the other hand, it would have given the Gamecocks the lead earlier and would have made it a two-score game (20-10) at the half, potentially altering the psychology and play-calling for LSU.

Succopmisses_medium
Not again.

Succop's struggles, though, could cause problems down the road -- either by costing South Carolina in close games or by forcing the offense to take too many chances on fourth downs. It's in his head; we all know this guy's leg, and he can kick the ball with strength and accuracy. But sometimes the injury to the brain is the hardest one to treat.

4. Defending the run: FAIL. The good news: The Gamecocks defense held RB Charles Scott, one-time Heism@n dark horse, to 61 yards rushing. Bad news: The rest of the LSU offense ran for 103 yards. In all, the Gamecocks surrendered 164 yards on the ground, which allowed LSU to chew up clock and dramatically shorten the game in the decisive fourth quarter. (LSU's time of possession in the fourth? 11:39.) It wasn't a Tyrone Nix-level breakdown -- nothing can quite top those -- but it was still a disappointing effort from Ellis Johnson and Co.

5. The big picture. Let's not kid ourselves: Despite the optimistic predictions offered here and elsewhere, this was always going to be a difficult game for South Carolina to win. LSU is one of the most talented teams in the country, they just lack some experience this year. The Gamecocks still have a chance for an eight-win season; Tennessee's blowout win over Mississippi State was much closer than it appears, Arkansas' strength is passing the football, and that should play into South Carolina's hands, and Clemson continues to tank no matter whom they fire. This is still the same team it was a week ago; the upset just didn't happen.

GRADE: C
South Carolina put itself in a position to win, the Gamecocks just couldn't do it when it mattered. You have to lose these games before you win them, and while we're all sick of losing them, there's still reason to believe South Carolina will win them one day soon.

Poll
Grade the Gamecocks
A
0 votes
B
7 votes
C
15 votes
D
6 votes
F
4 votes

32 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 4 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The running game...

Why don’t we run the ball outside more often? Running Mike D between the tackles is basically wasting a play, but we’ve had some intermittent success when we run the ball on the corners. Eric Baker’s run when he fumbled was, if I remember correctly, the only outside run we attempted with our TBs all night, and that was a five or six yard gain before the fumble (caused by a hit to the helmet, I should add). And a pitch to the outside would have been another way to make LSU pay for their blitzing tactics.

Go Cocks!

by Gamecock Man on Oct 19, 2008 9:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'd like to see some more WR screens

Have Kenny or even Cook take a step or two back, catch the ball and then run. We did that once that I can remember against LSU — I can’t remember right now whether it worked or I just want to think it did. But that would be the best solution right now, I think.

by cocknfire on Oct 20, 2008 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

WR screens...

The potential for big play screens was there all night, and it’s one of the few plays that we could have gotten off before Garcia was taken down/hurried. Don’t know why we didn’t go to this. We used to run these plays too much, now we don’t run them at all in the perfect situation.

Go Cocks!

by Gamecock Man on Oct 20, 2008 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why the 'D'

I have to admit that I gave the Gamecocks a ‘D’ for this game. Yes, we were in the game the whole time and our boys played well in many areas, but allowing 6 sacks to LSU, whom have had only 6 sack for the entire year previous, and to get out coached like that was poor. 0 pts in the second have because there were no adjustments made on either side of the ball. Having been a second half team all year, to have that type of break down in the second half was a poor performance by the coaches. That was also, probably, the worst showing by the o-line all year.

by Charlestowne on Oct 20, 2008 9:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about South Carolina Gamecocks.
Start posting about the Gamecocks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Rugby_small
USC Rugby rises to #20 in latest American Rugby News Top 25
Small
Who decommitted?
Sir_big_spur_small
Urban Meyer Paves Way to Become Next Gamecock Head Coach
Stuff_043_1__small
More from NYTimes about TN...
Antonia_small
An NFL interlude
Sir_big_spur_small
Go Cocks! Beat Cow U!
633626267691843190-thefailboat_small
USC/Clemson moved for a teeny bopper?
Images_small
Lady Gamecocks Win NCAA Opener

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Uscgamecocks_small Gamecock Man

Authors

Sir_big_spur_small The Feathered Warrior

Images_small GwinnettGamecock

Official Partner of CBS Sports