Garnet And Black Attack: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Ole Miss-Alabama: "Let's Go Eat.Wait. What Happened?"

Reviewing Florida / How the Gators Made Us Look Like an FCS Team

What can you say about this loss? The Gators destroyed us in all facets of the game. The final score was 56-6. They had 519 yards to our 173. They did everything right, and we did everything wrong.

The one good thing you can say about our performance is that the defense did its part in the first half. The final score may show a 28-3 halftime margin, but we giftwrapped 21 of those points and the other seven came on a long passing play when a Florida receiver got away with pushing off of Carlos Thomas. (I would complain about this and other instances of biased officiating, but what's the point--we were never in the game.) The defense slowed down the Gators' powerful offense and even caused a couple of turnovers. They wore out in the second half, but that happens when your offense goes three-and-out everytime they get the ball. This defense was good enough to help us win this game and is good enough to help us win our remaining two.

However, our offense is not good enough to beat the Gators and gives us reason to worry against Clemson and in whatever bowl we end up in. Our quarterbacks both have problems. Garcia is a great athlete but likes to take off running every time he's under pressure. That might work against UAB but it won't work against a defense like Florida's. Smelley understands the offense better and knows how to spread the ball around a bit but doesn't throw the ball accurately and is prone to bizarre brain farts. His first interception, when he basically threw the ball straight to Brandon Spikes, was beyond inexplicable. Our line can't block. Our receivers, other than Kenny McKinley and Jared Cook, either drop the ball or just look confused. On one forgetable play, Smelley threw a nice pass to Moe Brown.  Brown was in position to make the catch but didn't turn around to see that the ball was coming to him. Again, inexplicable.

Spurrier's rotating system compounded the problems. Spurrier claims that sending plays in with his quarterbacks helps solve some of the confusion problems that have hurt us and maybe he's right theoretically. However, in practice the system seems to do nothing but cause more confusion. Smelley has performed a little better over the last two games, so I think he should start against Clemson. However, the rotating has to stop. Start Smelley and if he plays well let him go the distance. If he comes out and throws a couple of interceptions early, let Garcia give it a try. I'll have to admit that my confidence in Garcia is not very high right now, though. He's a very gifted player, but when you look back on the last few games, he's only played well in spots. Spurrier is obviously right about him not being prepared mentally. He needs a year to better learn the offense.

I don't even want to talk about the lateral on the kickoff return. The call was foolish, especially on a wet field. Moreover, it reeked of desparation. Not much else to say about it, other than that Gary Danielson and Verne Lundquist's response to the official review of whether the guy who recovered the fumble scored or not proves yet again that these two are among the most biased, unprofessional pricks in broadcasting. As I said after the Georgia game, I really can't stand these guys. Lundquist also several times referred to our first series as a three-and-out even though we gained a first down on the first play. At least Danielson noticed that the refs missed an obvious call when Tebow horsecollared Eric Norwood during Norwood's fumble return.

While it's depressing to lose this way, we should remember that what happened yesterday was no different than what happened to LSU, Kentucky, Georgia, and Vandy. The Gators are peaking right now, and while we've proven that we're a decent team over the past few weeks, we're clearly not on their level this year. We can still top off a successful season by beating Clemson. We should be favored in that game, but not by much: the Tigers are down this year, but they still have a number of talented offensive playmakers and they will play for pride when we come to town. Our goal over the next two weeks is to find some sort of answer on offense. We need to get back to basics, figure out which quarterback to go with, and go to the Upstate with a plan to limit turnovers and put 30 points or so on the board. That should be enough to win if our defense holds up its end of the bargain.

Check out more info about Saturday's games at the SB Nation Race to the BCS page:

College Football BCS Rankings, Scores, Schedule and Blog Posts - SB Nation

 

0 recs  |  Comment 9 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Horse collar rule

Tim Tebow was not guilty of a horse collar tackle after the fumbled pitch to Rainey. I looked up some information on the rule change from the offseason, and I give you this:

Rogers Redding, NCAA football secretary-rules editor and coordinator of football officials for the Southeastern Conference, said the horse-collar ban may result in fewer back injuries.

"What we’re hearing from trainers and physicians is we’re getting some back injuries when the ball carrier is immediately snapped to the ground by being jerked quickly," he said. "If the ball carrier is grabbed by the shoulder or jersey and just ridden to the ground over a couple of yards, that’s not going to be a foul." (emphasis mine)

Tebow grabbed the shoulder and rode Norwood to the ground over several yards. That was a correct non-call.

by Year2 on Nov 16, 2008 3:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I stand corrected...

Thanks for the info.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com

by Gamecock Man on Nov 16, 2008 4:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

USC has talent offensively, but it really seems to lack an identity. Your best work against UF was with Smelley sitting back behind a wall of blockers throwing to his top two or three receivers, and occasionally handing off to a big guy between the tackles. (That’s been just about everybody’s best work against UF, it seems.) If Spurrier sticks with it, maybe bringing in Garcia occasionally to show a different look, you can get enough points to take care of Clemson.

The push-off would have annoyed me too, but UF’s receivers are really masterful at making just enough contact to affect the play, but not quite enough to draw a flag. (LSU, UGA and Vandy fans will all agree there, I think.) And the sad truth is that grounding and OPI are probably called a lot less often than they could be, simply because they’re so lethal to drives.

by peachy rex on Nov 16, 2008 6:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed...

Our best game offensively this year was against Ole Miss, when Smelley threw for over 300 yards in a pretty straight-forward down-field passing attack. That’s the offense I think we should go with against Clemson. Garcia may be a great player for us one day, but I’m becoming more and more convinced that he’s confused out there. He sometimes makes nice plays because of his athletic ability but is overall fairly inconsistent. I only want to see him occasionally or if Smelley comes out and plays like crap. That’s possible, of course, as Smelley is a somewhat inconsistent player who is either great or throws four interceptions.

As far as the push off, to a certain degree it was one of those fouls that players get away with a lot. However, teams like Bama and Florida get away with these much more than other teams, and that’s what I hate about SEC officiating. I’m sure you’ve probably seen the video of the end of the Arkansas-Ole Miss game, when an Arkansas player made a catch that would have set up a game winning FG but was called for OPI. He did nothing more than what the Gators receiver did on the play in question, and I have to think that it would be very rare for that call to go against the Gators.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com

by Gamecock Man on Nov 16, 2008 8:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

well stated...

I concur. Put the “L” beyond us and put a gameplan together to beat Clemson in 2 weeks.

by Flounder on Nov 16, 2008 7:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Gator fan here.

I chuckled a bit over the commentators being so biased. Im a Saattle fan in the pro sports and I wasnt used to it. No question how biased they were begging the refs to give us the Td and whatever.

Nonetheless its fun watching this team. Anyways, good luck the rest of the way to your guys.

by Slica on Nov 16, 2008 8:54 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Clemson game

I think it’s a great idea that the Gamecocks scheduled two weeks to prepare for the Tigers this year. That being said, Spurrier and co. need to use all of it to put into place a gameplan to beat Those People, as Robert E. Lee might say of his adversaries. The way I see it, a win vs. Clemson is a necessity. Anything else would be bad, especially for our recruiting. We need to poach off more recruits from their “in the bag” recruiting class. Oh and I want those annoying Clempson fans to shut the hell up for just one minute.

One more thing—It would be interesting if Phil Fulmer was the new coach for the Hill People. I honestly can’t see how it would turn out for the Tigers in the future. Does anyone know anything about this, or thoughts on it….?

--Robert

by a gamecock fan on Nov 17, 2008 9:19 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Yes, Clemson is a must-win game if there ever was one...

The way I see it, there were two must-win games on our schedule this year: Tennessee and Clemson. We’ve been trying to get a leg up on these two for years and this year ended up being a great chance to do so. We beat the Vols handily. Clemson is probably even more important because we need to capitalize on their problems to take over in-state recruiting. We have to win this game.

As far as their coaching search goes, I’ll have to admit that I pay minimal attention to it. I know they’ve been in touch with Fulmer, Bud Foster, and Lane Kiffin. My guess is that they would like to do better than Fulmer. Phil has a good track record but hasn’t done much over the past several years. He’s something of a known quantity in that there’s no reason to believe that he’ll be able to compete for a national title at Clemson if he couldn’t do it in Knoxville. Foster I don’t know a whole lot about, other than that he’s had some good defenses at VA Tech. He’s a bit of a wild card, as success as a coordinator doesn’t always equal success as a head coach. Kiffin would be a good hire, but I’ve heard that he wants to stay out on the west coast (maybe at Washington). As a Gamecock, I’d like them to get Fulmer—we already know that Spurrier can beat Phil, whereas the other two might end up building something huge at Clemson.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com

by Gamecock Man on Nov 17, 2008 11:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about South Carolina Gamecocks.
Start posting about the Gamecocks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Rugby_small
USC Rugby rises to #20 in latest American Rugby News Top 25
Small
Who decommitted?
Sir_big_spur_small
Urban Meyer Paves Way to Become Next Gamecock Head Coach
Stuff_043_1__small
More from NYTimes about TN...
Antonia_small
An NFL interlude
Sir_big_spur_small
Go Cocks! Beat Cow U!
633626267691843190-thefailboat_small
USC/Clemson moved for a teeny bopper?
Images_small
Lady Gamecocks Win NCAA Opener

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Uscgamecocks_small Gamecock Man

Authors

Sir_big_spur_small The Feathered Warrior

Images_small GwinnettGamecock

Official Partner of CBS Sports