5 POINTS: South Carolina at Florida -- Two days later, it's still ugly

Sorry it's late. No, I wasn't hiding -- in fact, I was proclaiming the greatness of the Gators. Just ran out of time.
1. Florida VROOOOOOOOM! Let's not kid ourselves. The better team won this game. That's not to say that Florida's 50 points better, though it's hard to argue that they aren't. Again, this is a team that has scored 38, 51, 63, 49, 42 and 56 in its last six games. And the talent they have is simply amazing. Against most teams, if you miss a tackle or two, it's a first down; against Florida, it's a touchdown. There's a reason no one has been able to stay on the field against the Gators since the upset against Ole Miss. Admiral Yamamoto might not have said, "I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve" -- but that's apparently exactly what Ole Miss did.
2. The QB rotation: End it. Apparently, Spurrier is already one step ahead of me on this one, but let's review (once again) the awful, awful results of creating mass confusion.
For the two combined weeks, then, the two-QB system resulted in a pass efficiency rating of 88.17. I can understand why Spurrier might have tried it, but it clearly didn't work. Fortunately, it didn't cost us the game that we should have won (Arkansas); short of Brett Favre donning Garnet and Black -- and probably even then -- the Gamecocks weren't going to beat the Gators.
3. The 2:15. Yes, the two interceptions and botched lateral killed South Carolina in this game. On the scoreboard, it didn't matter; the game is still 35-6 without the 21-point lead spotted to the Gators in the first quarter. But with the three miscues, all hope was dead before the second quarter even began.
4. The defense. The three short fields in the first quarter certainly didn't help, but the defense absolutely imploded Saturday. This is probably as much to Florida's credit as it is to South Carolina's detriment, but ugly is ugly. A total of 519 yards, including 346 rushing. This wasn't nearly as bad as Arkansas last year, and it came against a lot better team. But Ellis Johnson and Co. still have some work to do before visiting the Team from the Upstate.
5. Outback Bowl. The Gamecocks still have a trip to Tampa on the menu. Defeating the Team from the Upstate is the only way to make sure this happens. Let's not worry about anything else right now -- the Capital One Bowl is still a stretch.
Comments
Which QB do you want to see against Clemson?
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com
by Gamecock Man on
Nov 18, 2008 7:59 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Uhh....
the one that can give us a competent ground game? Frankly, I’m a little sick of both of them. The way things are going, it seems like Smelley for 3 quarters and then go to Garcia for the close.
--Robert
by a gamecock fan on
Nov 18, 2008 8:38 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If it's not Garcia...
… I’ll be irritated. I bet Garcia could have played better against Florida had he enjoyed the benefit of a year of practice. He’ll turn out to be a good one. Trust me.
Orange and Blue Hue: The World through GATOR-colored Glasses -- http://www.orangeandbluehue.com
by Gatorpilot on
Nov 18, 2008 12:59 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I have no doubt that Garcia would have played better against Florida with the benefit of a year of practice...
and that he will be a great QB for us over the next three years if he sticks with it and lives up to his potential. His ceiling is a lot higher than Smelley’s. However, he doesn’t have that year of practice under his belt and, after what we’ve seen out of him over the past couple of weeks, I wonder if he’s the right choice against Clemson.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com
by Gamecock Man on
Nov 18, 2008 1:38 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pretty big rivalry, eh?
Is there any team you’d rather beat more than Clemson? Kinda weird for me, I’ve never felt anything but ambivalence towards them.
Orange and Blue Hue: The World through GATOR-colored Glasses -- http://www.orangeandbluehue.com
by Gatorpilot on
Nov 18, 2008 2:28 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Not surprised you're ambivalent towards them...
They’re not a team the Gators play. I doubt you feel strongly about Georgia Tech either, but UGA and (to some degree) Auburn do. I wouldn’t care much about FSU if they hadn’t been a premier team in the 90s.
As far as there being anyone I’d rather beat, most of the time no. However, I’d rather us win an SEC Divisional Title and lose to Clemson than beat Clemson and have another ho-hum year in the SEC. So, if I knew we could win the East by winning going into Florida, I’d say I’d rather beat Florida. But yeah, under normal circumstances, Clemson will do.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com
by Gamecock Man on
Nov 18, 2008 4:39 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah
It’s an in-state rivalry vs. a school whose original intent was to provide an alternative and to eventually replace “our” school once/if the legislature could pass such a measure. Clemson is the physical embodiment of the more modern idea that one can be educated and have a successful professional life without all that “fancy booklearnin.” In the late 1800s it was with/thru agriculture and now it’s through majors like business management (whatever that means).
--Robert
by a gamecock fan on
Nov 19, 2008 7:39 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Right...
… Yeah, rivalries are unique. There are so many in the SEC. I could probably grow to dislike Clemson just because of their gaudy uniforms and that kindergarten paw-print emblazoned on their helmet. So generic. Until recently, I disliked them because a Bowden was at the helm, but that is no longer.
I wish them a fiery death-by-Spurrier and will be pulling for your boys on that day.
Orange and Blue Hue: The World through GATOR-colored Glasses -- http://www.orangeandbluehue.com
by Gatorpilot on
Nov 18, 2008 4:45 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Could some please explain to me...
how we are still having this discussion of Smelley vs. Garcia?
I had this long diatribe typed out about how Smelley throws way more INTs than Garcia, and that an under prepared Garcia is better for this team (both right now and in the future) than a fully prepared Smelley, but I clicked on a link to the side accidently and now I just don’t feel like going into it again.
Here’s the jist of it: could G&BA please do some in-depth analysis of Garcia vs. Smelley with respect to the last two games of the season? Perhaps it could be a feature leading up to the Clemson game. I just can’t come to terms with how Spurrier thinks Smelley is still the better option. I know Spurrier’s knowledge of football is so much greater than mine to make any comparison laughable, so I’m just trying to understand.
Food for thought: If our offense consisted soley of Mike Davis and the center for the first quarter of the Florida game, we would have done better than with Smelley in there.
by The Feathered Warrior on
Nov 18, 2008 5:10 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
You want comparisons over the last two games or over the entire season?
Over the course of the season, Garcia’s stats are a little better. However, over the last two games, Smelley’s stats are clearly better, although I guess you could say that his two interceptions in the first half against the Gators cost us all chance of keeping the game respectable.
At any rate, I might take you up on the comparative analysis sometime later this week.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com
by Gamecock Man on
Nov 18, 2008 5:37 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't like using the numbers over the last two games for either guy
It’s real easy to look like an idiot at quarterback when you’re coming in for one play, going back to the sideline and then coming back in. Both of them looked pretty bad Saturday, IMO.
Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.
by cocknfire on
Nov 18, 2008 5:57 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's def. true...
And it’s fair to wonder if Garcia has been really bad because he’s been lost in the rotating system. Before the past two weeks, he had looked, for the most part, better than Smelley.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com
by Gamecock Man on
Nov 18, 2008 6:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry, I was unclear.
What I meant to say was please compare Smelley’s performance to Garcia’s over the entire season, and extrapolate the findings to make a case for who should be the starter vs. Clemson and in our bowl game. Thanks.
by The Feathered Warrior on
Nov 18, 2008 8:59 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I watched Garcia
Against the Whos and Gators, and I have to question SOS’s sanity. He must see something in practice that we don’t. Garcia is mobile, better arm, throws a better pass, less picks, and you can run a more versatile offense around him. Granted, with the doghouse around him, he missed a lot of time to learn the system, but Smelley? He had (for a QB against the Gators) a decent game, but it’s clear that Garcia is the guy. The future is now. IF you got two, well…you know the rest.
by Stuck in the Plains on
Nov 18, 2008 7:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs







