Comparing Iowa and South Carolina: The QBs
The Contestants: Ricky Stanzi (Iowa) and Stephen Garcia (South Carolina)
Ricky Stanzi
Other than an occasional surprise play-action pass, Iowa doesn't throw the ball a whole lot until they get into third-and-long situations, preferring the put the offense into the capable hands of Shonn Greene. In contrast to South Carolina, Stanzi has attempted 235 passes this year, whereas Garcia and Smelley have combined for over 370. That said, Stanzi comes into this contest as a proven asset with a respectable resume. His 135.3 rating is solid, as is his 13-7 TD-INT ratio. Fumbles have been a problem for him at times, but he's typically been a reliable player.
Stephen Garcia
The most talked about player in Gamecocks history has had his ups and downs this year. At halftime of the LSU game, there was reason to believe that he was one of the best QBs in the SEC after he played well against UAB, bailed us out against Kentucky, and led us to a momentary lead over the Tigers after a stirring second-quarter performance. If I remember correctly, he sported a QB rating of over 150 after the Kentucky game and a lot of us thought he might be the second coming of Tim Tebow. Since halftime against LSU, however, Garcia has come back down to earth. His inability to respond to LSU's blitzes likely cost us that game. His performance against Tennesee was OK but was unspectacular. He played fairly dismally against Arkansas and Florida while rotating with Chris Smelley.
Why the change of fortunes? I, for one, believe Spurrier when he says that Garcia's problems stem from a lack of knowledge of the playbook. In early performances, that wasn't so much of a problem because teams didn't know what to expect from him. Now, however, that's not the case, and it shows. I still believe that Garcia has all the physical tools necessary to be a great SEC quarterback. He has a strong, accurate arm and can pick up yards on the ground occasionally. But despite the rants of the clowns that say Spurrier should let Garcia "do his thing," Garcia must improve his football smarts if he's ever going to live up to his potential. Garcia is a mobile QB, but he's not Kordell Stewart. That said, I wouldn't be averse to hearing that Spurrier has added a few plays to his playbook that take advantage of Garcia's mobility.
Conclusion
Although I think Garcia has the potential to be much better than Stanzi one day, Stanzi has clearly been the better player this year due to his having demonstrated a level of consistency that Garcia has lacked. That said, there's hope that Garcia can learn a few things over the next two weeks, and if he does, he could be a dangerous player that could transform this offense. Early reports out of practice are positive, but until we see the results on the field, Iowa wins this battle.
Advantage: Iowa
1 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
No contest!
Until Garcia can lead the Cocks to a win, against a top 5 team, trailing by two scores in the 4th quarter, on national TV, he is not in the league of Stanzi, the Manzi. Yes, Stanzi has been there, done that. This is not an “edge” to Iowa, this is a mismatch.
"I want to rush for 1,000 or 1,500 yards, whichever comes first."
- George Rogers, one-time South Carolina RB
by StoopsMyAss on Dec 17, 2008 12:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
We'll see...
Garcia may be capable of more than you think he is.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com
by Gamecock Man on Dec 17, 2008 1:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
in the muck, at home
fixed.
"penis fish"…google that, and the candiru is the first thing that pops up
by Stuck in the Plains on Dec 17, 2008 2:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Stanzi is great....
……about 75% of the time.
And the other 25% he has the potential of being THE VICTORY KILLER.
Which Stanzi we see may very well be the difference in this game. Also, the Iowa defense has a troubling habit of not blitzing blitz-rattled QB’s, putting them instead into EXTREME COMFORT ZONE territory.
This is one reason we lost to NW (the main one was turnovers, but this didn’t help, IMO). Against a blitz, CJ Bacher is a quavering pile of pudding. But we laid off him, and he killed us in the second half.
If our front four can’t pressure Garcia, he could literally have a career passing day.
It will be interesting to see what happens with our respective QB’s.
If it's not too much trouble, search your soul--and then ask yourself if maybe I might have a point.
by The Director on Dec 17, 2008 6:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wait
We can’t brag on Stanzi too much (yet – hopefully). We have the PSU game Stoops so eloquently referred to, but also the Illini crapfest. The Manzi brough IA back in that game, but it was his fault he had to. I, for one, still keep my fingers crossed on most dropbacks, just hoping to avoid the dreaded throw into 3x coverage. Losing usc’s safety for failure to attend at least 2 classes helps me feel a little better about this.
by txhawkeye on Dec 17, 2008 5:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
People, People, People!
First off, very few college QBs EVER do what Stanzi did vs. Penn State. To do it in your fourth or fifth game ever as a college QB is nothing short of astonishing. For example, Jimmy Clausen, Mark Sanchez, and on and on of lauded HS QBs who have never done and the many more who wil not do it, demands your respect for Stanzi. I frankly was in awe. As for ripping him for losses…yep, he killed us in some games. That is what first-year QBs do. But he grew, measurably and undeniably. He stood up in the most important game that IOWA has played in a while and won it, after seemingly losing it. He has the kind of indifference to failing that makes for a great QB in the long run, if (and this is big) if there is steady growth.
I expect Stanzi to be rock solid in this game. He has never had this kind of time and attention to pay to an opposing defense. I am convinced that our system will expose, not embolden Garcia too. Our system forces him to have a hot hand and keep it hot for four quarters. Mucch like the PItt game, their QB was hot, hot, hot and then POOF the system broke him down. It was beautiful and impressive how quicckly that game turned. We just missed FGs and made a boneheaded QB decision.
End of the day, this post was about comparing QBs and it would take some Paris Hilton-like logic to place this Garcia even in the same hemisphere with Stanzi.
"I want to rush for 1,000 or 1,500 yards, whichever comes first."
- George Rogers, one-time South Carolina RB
by StoopsMyAss on Dec 17, 2008 10:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Secretly, I agree with this. My iowan-ish is to to expect the worst, so am happy when any whiff of success is achieved.
by txhawkeye on Dec 18, 2008 11:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No need to be shy...
Stanzi is a rare find. He is humble but fearless, has great tools, can throw all the throws. He will be very good in this game. I know KOK expects USC to pack the line and force Stanzi to win this game. So, first, expect a lot of diffferent ways to get the ball to Shonn…dump passes, screens, pitches, lots of motion, and also expect Sanzi to go deep, often and early to loosen the safeties. If that doesn’t work then back to Shonn…if it does, he will stay with it like at Minn. and then go to Shonn in second Q. It’s pick your poison time for USC. They will choose to pack the line so the wideouts better be ready to catch some balls.
"I want to rush for 1,000 or 1,500 yards, whichever comes first."
- George Rogers, one-time South Carolina RB
by StoopsMyAss on Dec 18, 2008 10:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 











