Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

BlogPoll Ballot Finale: Countdown to No. 1

Top5_medium
Going the opposite way this time to add to the countdown effect. Beginning with...

5. OKLAHOMA
I can summarize my biggest reasons for optimism and pessimism with Oklahoma in two words: Sam Bradford. His statistics as a freshman are almost unfathomable: 69.5 percent completion rate, 3,121 yards, 36 TDs, 8 INTs. This in a high-pressure environment where every move you make on the field is subject to some of the most intense scrutiny in college football.

There's also the matter of a sophomore slump. Yes, some of that is made up. But it is also real. Defenses now have a season full of video to look at with Bradford. They will be better prepared this year.

At the other skill positions, RB Allen Patrick is gone. But these are the Soooners, and you know they have a replacement, in this case RB DeMarco Murray, who averaged 6.0 ypc last year and actually had more TDs (13) than Patrick (8). The top receivers in terms of yardage (Juaquin Iglesias, 907) and TDs (Jermaine Gresham, 11) both return.

The lines are deep on both sides of the ball, though the linebackers and secondary could be weaknesses.

Meanwhile, the schedule is tough, but not murderously so. Kansas and Texas Tech come to Norman, as do the toughest nonconference games -- Cincinnati and TCU. Texas is in "neutral" Dallas. The Sooners' road slate? Try at Washington, at Baylor, at Kansas State, at Texas A&M and at Oklahoma State. But there's a trip-up in there somewhere, most likely against the Red Raiders or the Longhorns. And if they get to the Big XII Championship Game undefeated, I believe they will lose. More on that in a moment.

4. SOUTHERN CAL
I tried a thought exercise a couple of weeks ago with a knowledgeable college football friend of mine. "I present to you a team that lost its starting quarterback, leading rusher, leading receiver and four of its five starting offensive linemen. Would you rank them in the Top 5?"

"No," this friend responded.

Of course, once I told him that the team in question was Southern Cal, he backed off almost immediately, saying, "Well, that would be the one exception." But why? What makes any team invulnerable to the laws of football? Isn't this the same idea -- talent and solid coaching uber alles -- that got us into so much trouble with Miami a few years ago?

Carrollwinforever_medium
But what if you can't?

Now, with Mark Sanchez injured, it's easy to see things going south for the Trojans -- at least by their standards. Sure, Sanchez could be back by the game at Virginia; but how much will missing a couple weeks of practice cost him? Some? None?

And the receiving corps is still a question. One of the returning WRs had 50 catches. The top receiver, TE Fred Dvais, is gone. He also had the higest yardage per catch among anyone on the team with 20 or more receptions last year. The Trojans have a lot of talent there, but do they have the high-caliber threats that power a passing game?

Don't get crazy. Of course I'm putting Southern Cal in my Top 5. But there are way too many questions to put them in the title game, or anywhere near it. They can answer those questions and win their way into the Top 3. They need to earn it, though.

3. FLORIDA
Consider this: Florida got 1,659 rushing yards last year from two players whose official positions were not RB (QB TTIIMM TTEEBBOOWW and WR Percy Harvin). So it was understandable that, when coach Urban Meyer told the assembled crowd at SEC Media Days that he was actually pleased with his running backs, you could almost hear a pin drop. Even a crowd in love with TTIIMM TTEEBBOOWW had to listen to this pronouncement: The one missing offensive cog for Florida had been filled.

But the biggest hole in the defense last year remains its biggest hole this year: The secondary isn't just a unit that was bad last year, it's a unit that is practically nonexistent this season after injuries and off-the-field issues. Granted, there are a lot of things to like about the rest of the defense, but watching a secondary get scorched against Michigan to end last year and then banged up before this season even begins leaves one slightly uncomfortable about the Gators' chances.

Still, they have one Heisman winner (Tebow) and another candidate (Harvin, if he heels). The question is not whether the defense will be good enough for Florida to be a good team, but whether the defense will be good enough for Florida to be a great team.

Florida might have an easier path than Georgia, but not by much. They still play Miami, at Tennessee, LSU, Georgia (in Jacksonville) and at Florida State. The only gimme wins are Hawaii, at Vanderbilt and The Citadel.

Almost everyone agrees that the winner of the Florida-Georgia game will play for it all in January. I happen to think the winner will not be the Gators.

2. MISSOURI
There's no need to pretend that Missouri is the perfect contender: the Tigers are not. But QB Chase Daniel and WR Jeremy Maclin are great places to start. Daniel threw for 4,306 yards and a 68.2 percent completion rate last year, tossing 33 TDs against 11 INTs. And he threw in 253 yards and four scores on the ground. (His rushing net was 471, but remember that sacks come off rushing numbers in college.)

Mizzou had the 5th-ranked offense in Division I-A last year, ringing up 490.3 ypg, and the only truly crushing loss is RB Tony Temple, who rushed for 1,039 yards and 12 TDs. If he can be replaced, the Tigers' offense will roll.

A defense that yielded 378.9 ypg returns 10 starters, but that could be as much a recipe for improvement as a cause for concern. They return all three of their top tacklers. Consider this: With last year's defense, Missouri beat every team it faced except Oklahoma. Trim that ypg down by 25-50 (not a proposition beyond the realm of possibility), and the Tigers become one of the most difficult teams to beat in the country.

Missouri has an opening month that's just easy enough to go 4-0 and just tough enough to generate some buzz: match-ups with Illinois, SE Missouri, Nevada and Buffalo. The toughest stretch begins Oct. 4, with consecutive games at Nebraska, against Oklahoma State, at Texas and against Colorado. Get through that, and it should be smooth sailing to Kansas and the Big XII Championship Game (if they make it there).

The Tigers might be a bold pick, but there are dumber choices you could make.

1. GEORGIA
So there it is. It hasn't changed. The winner of the prestigious C&F Preseason No. 1 Ranking is Georgia. It's truly an honor. Previous winners include last year's Texas team, who rode the ranking all the way to the Holiday Bowl, and 2006 Notre Dame, who ended up getting blasted 41-14 in the Sugar Bowl.

Moreweis_medium
Gee, thanks.

So, now that I've given you all the reason you need to pay rapt attention to my No. 1 selection, the case for the spelling-challenged Dawgs:

Sure, sure, there are questions about whether Matt Stafford can have "the season." But if he can raise that completion percentage from 55.7 percent to, say, 58 to 60 percent, and if Knowshon Moreno can come anywhere close to duplicating last year's 1,334 yard, 14 TD campaign, it will be difficult to stop Georgia. Dannell Ellerbe and Asher Allen anchor a tough defense that surrendered 323.2 ypg last year.

As for the schedule, it's difficult, but forgive me if I don't think it is prohibitively so. Georgia should cruise through games against Georgia Southern and Central Michigan. If the spelling-challenged Dawgs navigate the next two games -- at South Carolina (a team that always plays Georgia tough) and at Arizona State -- they shouldn't be challenged again until an Oct. 25 game at LSU. (Yes, I know the Tennessee game is Oct. 11; more on that tomorrow.) Yes, they play Florida (in Jacksonville), at Kentucky and at Auburn before ending the season at Georgia Tech, but how is this more difficult than, say, Florida's 2006 schedule? And if a defeat should come, it will be hard to argue that a one-loss Georgia team will be less deserving than any other one-loss team in the country.

Identify a loss: Florida, the team Georgia drilled last year? An Auburn team, with two new coordinators, that the Bulldogs blasted last year? What have either of those teams done that makes them that much better than UGA?\

South Carolina could pull a second upset, but that's unlikely. Tennessee will be down. Those are the only two losses from last season.

No, Georgia will win 11 or 12 games in the regular season, win the SEC and win the national championship.

Now, excuse me while I go order a few dozen cases of Pepto-Bismol.

After the jump: How the entire ballot would look if cast right now; feel free to criticize, mock or praise, if you feel so inclined.

Star-divide

1. Georgia
2. Missouri
3. Florida
4. Southern Cal
5. Oklahoma
6. Ohio State
7. The Team from the Upstate
8. Auburn
9. Texas Tech
10. LSU
11. West Virginia
12. Texas
13. Illinois
14. Kansas
15. North Carolina
16. Rutgers
17. Wisconsin
18. Penn State
19. Arizona State
20. BYU
21. Alabama
22. South Florida
23. Mississippi State
24. Colorado
25. Wake Forest

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Miss St - but no UT or USC?

I think you have your SEC upside down. If you believe the Gamecocks will beat UK / VU / ARK / NCSU / WOFF / UAB, and you have to figure UT will get 6-7 wins in the same fashion, and one will win the game at W-B, why is an 8 win SEC East team not in your Top 25?

And also, as SMQ pointed out not too long ago, Miss St. was very fortunate last year. They will likely be 5th in the SECW this year.

"I make love to pressure."
-- Stephen Jackson

by USCKB on Aug 12, 2008 9:07 AM EDT reply actions  

I can see a way both teams can win seven

And not really deserve to be in the Top 25. I’ll have more on that a bit later.

As for the Mississippi State thing: Yes, they got real lucky last year. But they get a lot of their pieces back on offense and defense. Alabama is still down-ish, Arkansas is definitely down and I’m not buying the Ole Miss hype yet. So I can see the Bulldogs winning at La Tech, SE La, at Georgia Tech, Vanderbilt, Middle Tennesee, Kentucky, Arkansas and at Mississippi—that’s eight wins. Throw in an “upset” against Alabama or Tennessee, something I think is doable, and you get to nine. Few of those wins are likely to be impressive, which is why I have them down at the bottom. But the idea that they’re destined for a bad season is I think more a reflection of how they won last year than their prospects for this year.

by cocknfire on Aug 12, 2008 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

MSU...

I don’t think I’ve read that SMQ piece, which sounds interesting. I’ll have to look it up. From where I was sitting, MSU’s number of Ws def. didn’t reflect their performance last year. Their offense was putrid and their defense was opportunistic but hardly great. They managed to win all their close games, while losing badly in multiple games.

As for this year, sure, they’ve got a lot of pieces coming back, but those aren’t great pieces, esp. on offense. I’m not sure that I agree that they’ll likely win against Ga Tech, Arkansas, or Ole Miss, although I suppose it’s likely that they’ll win one or two of those games. And I would say that Ws against Bama or UT are pretty unlikely. All in all, I see them as a six- or seven-win team, good for a possible slot in the Independence Bowl. That wouldn’t be a dissapointment for them, either. All Croom needs to do this year to prove that his program is on the move is to show that last year wasn’t a complete fluke. A lower-tier bowl slot will do that, considering where they were for several years before last season.

BTW, C&F, I returned your email.

by Gamecock Man on Aug 12, 2008 2:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Touche, cocknfire...

You had the stones to do two things I didn’t:
- Drop USC out of the top 2 (Trust in Carroll, I guess)
- Push my Missouri Tigers above the No. 5 spot

This Mizzou team scares me just by virtue of the fact that they actually should run the table as planned. It’s fun when you’re good and aren’t supposed to be. We’re learning quickly that it’s pretty damn scary to be expected to be good.

And just a quick note, in truth, the defense returns 10 starters, rather than the 8 you cited. If you got the info from Steele, he missed out on the return of LB Van Alexander from knee surgery, as well as fail to note that S Justin Garrett got multiple starts in place of the injured Pig Brown last year. This defense has so much experience and is progressing so well that it might finally wrestle away some of that spotlight from the offense, even if the yardage doesn’t show it in the pass-happy, yard-gaining Big 12.

Here’s to hoping you prove yourself right on the “bold” pick…

http://www.RockMNation.com
Chance McDanielson for Heisman

by RPT on Aug 12, 2008 3:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about South Carolina Gamecocks.

Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Uscgamecocks_small Gamecock Man

Authors

Sir_big_spur_small The Feathered Warrior

Images_small GwinnettGamecock

Ape-rogers-g-sc-8x10_small tryptic67

Roflbot_small Connor Tapp

Forevertothee_small Skulls and Spurs