Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Diego Sanchez and the Dangers of Fame in MMA

Vanderbilt at South Carolina Postgame: Topics for Discussion

My hats off to Vanderbilt for playing such a gritty game. I'll have a full recap up tomorrow. For now, here are some things to think about.

1. Phew. That was close, but we beat Vandy. It wasn't beautiful and I would have liked to see us build more momentum going into the tough part of our schedule, but it does feel good to get a win over these guys after two years of futility. In the end, a win is a win, and we got the win. It's also worth saying that this is a game we probably wouldn't have won last year. This year's team made the plays it needed to make and hung tough at the end.

2. The offense played well, but it didn't show up on the scoreboard. What's the problem? I actually thought the offense played quite well in this game, especially Stephen Garcia, Alshon Jeffrey, and Kenny Miles. I think this might have been the best game Garcia has played for us; he made good decisions and put a number of tough throws right on the money. That TD toss to Jeffrey was a thing of beauty, and the earlier touchdown pass was also a good throw that D. L. Moore should have caught more cleanly. (That was a catch, though; his left foot was down when he gained possession.) The offensive line had some problems, but I wouldn't say they played a bad game outside of the penalties. All in all, we put up 432 total yards. That's a good night against a tough defense.

However, we only got 14 points out of it, and all those yards don't mean a thing without points to show for them. Some of the problems weren't exactly in our control, such as the bad field position we often had due to Vandy's stellar special teams play. However, some of the problems are things we need to work on. Penalties killed some of our drives, and our play calling seemed to get strange when we would get close to the red zone. I also thought Spurrier was a little too conservative late in the game; it's one thing to run it up the middle every time when you're up by two scores and another altogether to do it when you're only up by four and need to get a few more first downs. The conservative approach was even more suprirsing considering how hot Garcia was.

3. Penalties. What's the problem? There are some penalties that I can stand, like Melvin Ingram's facemask early in the game. Ingram was playing hard and was just in a bad position. But all these mental mistakes from the offensive line are frustrating. You'd think that our coaches would have addressed these problems by this point in the year, but apparently not. We really need to limit this stuff down the stretch if we're going to finish strong.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

We Survived

1. If we had turned the ball over, we would have lost. Just like last year. Just like the year before.

2. It looks like Vandy’s attached to us like a lamp ray. They seem to pick a team to be their bete noire. It used to be Bama, who would win (but ugly) in the 1990s. Now it is us. Johnson is an old Clemson guy and feels he can beat us any Saturday – with justification.

3. I was worried about all the “we’re prepared for Vandy” talk. The more I hear a team say how “prepared” they are for another team whose got their number, the more I am convinced they’re saying what the coaches want to hear, not true preparation – at least of the mental kind. Once again it seemed like we came out to put our helmets on the field. At least we had no turn overs.

4. How upset can we be, though, truly (except kick coverage)(and penalities)(and fourth quarter play calling)? Vandy is a proud team with a bowl win from last year and a 2 game win streak against Carolina … and with their back to the wall (just like UK three weeks ago).

5. They’re going to be days like this. Hopefully, we correct it all for Knoxville. Going to Neyland is a BIG game.

by tryptic67 on Oct 25, 2009 6:46 AM EDT reply actions  

Penalties

The one thing this offense simply can’t do is get into 3rd and 15 or 3rd and 20 (or worse). But this happens every week. I just don’t get it.

--Robert
A Towers Alumnus

by a gamecock fan on Oct 25, 2009 10:43 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

And so many of them are stupid mental mistakes. It happened everytime we would start a promising drive; we'd get a couple of first downs and then..

Wham. Penalties or a sack. 3rd and 20. It was even 3rd and 20 when we scored the second touchdown.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Oct 25, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

agree

we must avoid the 3rd and long scenario as that forces us to have to gamble with a big pass play. It can work vs some teams but not so sure it will vs the Kiffin Cover 2 UT D with Berry back there.

must get positive yards on 1st and 2nd down in Knoxville or the drive down I-40 will be even longer Sunday

Gamecocks Blog - http://www.leftoverhotdog.blogspot.com
Twitter - http://twitter.com/LOHDgamecocks

by Flounder on Oct 26, 2009 9:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about South Carolina Gamecocks.

Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Uscgamecocks_small Gamecock Man

Authors

Sir_big_spur_small The Feathered Warrior

Images_small GwinnettGamecock

Ape-rogers-g-sc-8x10_small tryptic67

Roflbot_small Connor Tapp

Forevertothee_small Skulls and Spurs