Quick Bye-Week Thoughts on Carolina-Clemson
by Gamecock Man on Nov 18, 2009 12:44 PM EST
in Football
1 comment
- All in all, this is probably one of the best Clemson teams in many years, at least in the sense that they haven't suffered from the same inconsistency that they have had in years past. What does that mean to us? Perhaps not much. The difference between this Clemson team and the units Tommy Bowden led is that this team has a lower variance, not that it's necessarily capable of playing at the level of Florida, Alabama, or Texas. This is to say that this team probably doesn't have a higher single-game ceiling than past teams, and since Clemson has always played its best game of the year against us, we can probably expect more of the same from them this year. If we lose, though, we might not be able to use the old excuse that the Palmetto Bowl is Clemson's Super Bowl, because this year the Tigers will likely be in Jacksonville.
- C.J. Spiller, as you all know, is having a phenomenal year. I hate to admit this, but I really think that the fact that he's not getting more Heisman attention is a blow to the Heisman's credibility. (As if it still had any...) Spiller has rushed for almost 900 yards, caught for almost 400, has over 500 kickoff return yards, and has around 200 punt return yards. He has a total of 14 touchdowns. Add to that the fact that he has almost signle-handedly won games for Clemson this year, and you have the makings of a player that is one of the most talented in the country and that means as much to his team as anyone. Unfortunately for him, he probably won't get much of a look for the Heisman because he doesn't play for one of the glamour programs.
- As far as our defensive strategy goes, you can bet that Ellis Johnson will keep a spy on Spiller at all times, given Spiller's ability to break one every play. However, while Spiller is clearly the Tigers' best player and the guy they center their offense around, he's not their only threat. In particular, we'll have to keep a close eye on Jacoby Ford, another guy that can make some big plays at times, especially if we sleep on him while focusing on Spiller. The best way to stop these guys? We need to get in the backfield early and often and keep these guys from developing plays in space. Clemson is somewhat vulnerable to a good push up front, so if we can get back to playing like we did against Ole Miss, we might have a chance.
- Clemson's defense is pretty good, although it has shown cracks against some of the ACC's better offenses. The key, probably, is that the Tigers have a nice defensive front that we'll have to stop. Really, I think we can move the ball against Clemson. The problem for us will be, as always, whether or not we can convert scoring opportunities.
0 recs |
1 comment
|
Email
Print
Comments
“If we lose, though, we might not be able to use the old excuse that the Palmetto Bowl is Clemson’s Super Bowl, because this year the Tigers will likely be in Jacksonville.”
How is this game ever Clemson’s “Super Bowl”? I can’t remember the last time the Tigers had more to win in this game than the Gamecocks did. I mean, four of the last seven years USC just had to beat Clemson to make a bowl game, and lost every time. Clemson has only been in that situation once in the last decade, in 2004, and won the game. And don’t forget Clemson just let Tommy Bowden go, a coach who had great success against USC (albeit success that Clemson fans have become accustomed to).
My point is the Clemson-USC game almost always means more to the Gamecocks than the Tigers. It is hard to take a team seriously when they haven’t won consecutive games against you since 1969-1970.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
