National Signing Day 2009: Overview and the Offensive Line
Steve Spurrier and his staff have hauled in the Rivals.com 12th-ranked recruiting class. We finished less than 20 points behind number 11 Miami and less than 100 behind number six Florida State. There's a sizable jump between FSU and number five Texas, which is at the bottom of a short list of elite teams that hauled in truly magnificent classes.
Here's how the SEC stacked up in the Rivals rankings:
1. Alabama
2. LSU
9. Georgia
10. Florida
12. South Carolina
14. Arkansas
16. Ole Miss
18. Auburn
22. Mississippi State
23. Tennessee
42. Kentucky
73. Vanderbilt
That's right, folks; the SEC garnered 10 teams in the Top 25, and Kentucky did better than they usually do, even getting a truly elite QB prospect in Morgan Newton. The rich get richer, as they say.
While we missed out on a couple of high-profile prospects on signing day and consequently didn't make the Top 10 for the second time in three years, this was another good class for Spurrier and his team. While results have been disappointing over the past two years, Spurrier has improved the overall talent level in Columbia, at least in terms of how these kids were rated coming out of high school. He deserves credit for that. We have as much talent here now as we've ever had, and if our coaching staff and players can meet halfway and mold this group into the team it's capable of becoming, we might actually do some things over the next few years.
Over the next couple of weeks, I'm going to take a look at how we did at each position. As most of you know, a team can garner a lofty recruiting ranking by raking in highly rated players, but it's just as important that a team get players that address its needs. I'll be rating us by position based on two simple factors: what did we need, and how well did we fill that need. Today, we'll look at how we did recruiting the offensive line. Before we do this, though, I'm going to say that you should take my words with a grain of salt here. I'm not a recruiting expert and don't know as much as people do about these new guys.
Offensive Line
Obviously, this has been considered one of our major areas of need due to its poor performance over the past couple of seasons. I'm not sure the problem has been a lack of talent, as we're actually fairly deep and young at the line positions, as we're only graduating one significant lineman this year (Jamon Meredith). I'm willing to bet that the biggest recruit for the OL we picked up was new coach Eric Wolford. That said, a few good linemen certainly can't hurt.
We recruited one high school linemen--Nick Allison (3 stars)--and two from junior colleges--Steven Singleton (3) and Kevious Watkins (2). We missed out on two higher profile players, Johnnie Farms and Quinton Washington. Allison, like most freshmen linemen, will likely need to bulk up 15-25 pounds before he'll be ready to take the field. Singleton and the massive 340 pount Watkins, on the other hand, may be ready to go right away. That's a good thing in the short term. In the long term it could hurt our depth at the position, as these two will be graduating in two years, although sometimes you don't get more than two good years out of linemen anyways because they usually take time to break into the rotation.
I'm going to call this a solid, B- linemen class. It would have been nice to have landed Washington and/or Farms, but the JUCOs should be ready next year if needed and Allison could turn out to be a decent player under Wolford's tutelage.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You know...
some Gamecock fans (and more Clemson fans) will look at our top 25 recruiting classes and our subsequent records and whine about our “under performance.” But look at this, we pull down the 12th best class in the nation and we’re still only 5th in the SEC. I mean, this is amazing. Sure, our offensive collapse down the stretch of the last two seasons has been more than disappointing, but if you look at where we’ve finished we’ve done pretty much what you would expect a team doing as much (re)building as we have to do. Everyone would like to see results quickly. At least, to me, this recruiting class once again shows some signs of progress. That fact that Spurrier and Co. was able to bring in the 12th best class in the nation amid the coaching turnover and the losing streak we had speaks volumes about not only his commitment to USC, but also the progress we have made.
But yes, the lack of a proven QB still concerns me.
by The Feathered Warrior on Feb 4, 2009 9:23 PM EST reply actions
Good point...
We all want to see some improvement in the conference standings and I think it’s a reasonable expectation to some degree, but Spurrier is going up against a hard job. All SEC teams save Vandy and Kentucky were in the Top 25. It’s not like we’re playing a bunch of patsies here.
I watched Spurrier / Beamer press conference, and Spurrier talked a lot about the possibilities he sees for this group of incoming players, about how they could be some of the first to win big at Carolina in a long time. It’s getting a little old to hear this stuff all the time when we never see it on the field, but you have to credit him with still having the desire to do it. And he is bringing in the talent.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com
by Gamecock Man on Feb 4, 2009 10:02 PM EST up reply actions
So yeah.
I’ve done a lot of complaining on here about “lofty expectations” and “potential” and blah blah blah. But I do agree. While it may be unsatisfactory to me, there is no doubt that this team is improving. The state of the program is much better than it was five years ago and light years away from ten years ago. We’re pulling in players, guys are getting experienced, but now we just need to put it together. The jury is still out on the Spurrier years, but for right now, I believe he has pushed the program forward in the toughest division in college football. A couple things though. 1. While I don’t think that it is a worry at this very moment, I think that by being “competent,” the North Carolina Tarheels could be a future threat to Gamecock success. The Gamecocks need to be and stay a pan-Carolina team in composition in order to offset the Floridas and Georgias of the SEC. But if North Carolina can start to dominate that state in recruiting, then the Gamecocks may have a problem. I’d be interested to hear some thoughts on this, if anyone has them.
2. I hope Lane Kiffin falls flat on his face.
--Robert
by a gamecock fan on Feb 5, 2009 1:09 PM EST up reply actions
Well, we've gotten most of our prospects out of South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida this year and in the past...
Although yeah, we’ve gotten some good ones out of North Carolina as well, and if UNC continues to improve, that state could become a more difficult place to recruit. So, I’m not sure; UNC could hurt us, but maybe not as much as it might seem.
As far as Kiffin goes, I agree that Urban Meyer cheats, but geez…this guy is really trying to step on people’s toes. Love ‘em or hate ’em, UT’s personality has always seemed a little more reserved and austere to me. Kiffin doesn’t seem to fit the mold, and I wonder what Vols fans think of him. He’s certainly managed to piss off just about every fan of the other SEC schools in only a couple of months.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com
While I'd like to see an SEC championship some time soon...
I think USC’s next feat of progress will be to establish itself as “solidly third” (Spurrier a la Stephen Garcia anyone?) in the SEC East. UT is down right now, and any time a prgram experiences change there is a possibility of disaster. I too hope that Kiffin falls on his face and then USC, UGA, and Florida collectively step on said face with the pointy end of a hob-nailed boot (whatever that is).
by The Feathered Warrior on Feb 5, 2009 5:19 PM EST up reply actions
A agree about UNC.
They’re a dangerous foil in recuiting terms becasue of A) their proximity, B) their basketball history/ success, and C) their academic reputation. All of these things would seem to indicate that they will be a tough team to recruit against if they ever start enjoying a little bit of success. But I also agree with Gamecock Man’s assessment that it’s not that huge a deal. The amount of great SC talent alone that leaves this state is enough to field a decent team. Hopefully Alshon Jefferey will be the first of many more highly touted recruits to play for the home team. Anyhow, we’ll have a chance to prove ourselves once again when UNC comes to Williams-Brice to finish out the home-and-home.
by The Feathered Warrior on Feb 5, 2009 5:14 PM EST up reply actions
South Carolina, truth be told, has enough talent...
And if we could ever beat Clemson more than once every five years, we could get a bigger piece of that pie.
Also agree about becoming solidly third. It seems like a very reasonable goal, with Tennessee down. If we can do that, the players and, when Spurrier retires, the coach will come that can help us stay that way.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans. http://www.garnetandblackattack.com
Good haul, guys...
I made the point over at Roll Bama Roll that the story of this year’s draft recruiting class will not be the 3-4 marquee guys, it will be the quietly-excellent talent that the middle of the pack and lower echelon schools pulled in. The SEC is about to get much, much harder (if that were possible).
"penis fish"…google that, and the candiru is the first thing that pops up
by Stuck in the Plains on Feb 6, 2009 9:13 AM EST reply actions

by 













