2010 South Carolina Gamecocks Football: Good, But Not Good Enough
To conclude my roundup of the 2010 football season, I'm going to echo what Skulls and Spurs has already written: this season was good, but it wasn't good enough. It was a season of several notable highs and, considering our historical track record, I don't think you can argue that it wasn't a banner year for Carolina football. However, considering what we could have done this year, it can't be considered a great season.
The list of firsts that this team accomplished is considerable. First time to beat a top-ranked team. First time to beat Clemson twice in a row since the Nixon administration. First victory in the Swamp. First trip to Atlanta. First nine-win season since 2001 and third overall. First time so many Carolina players have gotten significant national press. We could be on the verge of another first, first time to sign the nation's top-rated recruit. (Pretty please.) These were all significant steps forward for a program that seemed perpetually stuck in second gear under Steve Spurrier, not to mention every coach that came before him. Spurrier has now proved that he can field a winner at Carolina, and the job he did, including the work he put in leading up to it over the past few years, has to a large degree vindicated his tenure in Columbia. Make no mistake, it ain't easy to win like this at USC. Many seemingly talented coaches have failed miserably in the past. Combine the program's historical ineptitude and consequent recruiting disadvantages with the level of competition in the SEC, and you've got a tough job. Even the most pessimistic viewer has to look at how this season stacks up against history and view what we did as progress.
Oh, what could have been, though. When I think back on this season, I'll of course immediately remember the wins over Alabama and Florida, both of which were monumental moments for the program. The next thing I'll probably remember, though, is the inexplicable loss to what turned out to be a below average Kentucky team. (And make no mistake; this year's Kentucky was not as good as some of the Rich Brooks teams.) I'll never understand how we lost that game. Well, I take that back; I get why we lost. Our star RB got hurt, our QB wet the bed, and our coaching staff went stupid and decided that we needed to throw the ball downfield while holding a sizeable lead against one of the worst run-defending teams in the nation. What I don't understand is why this happened; for a team and coaching staff that seemed to be making all the right choices for most of the year, it was inexplicable. And inexcusable. That loss should have never happened, and it kept us from winning ten games. The same goes for the bowl, another game where coaching decisions led to us losing to an opponent with inferior personnel.
I also continue to be surprised that Spurrier can't field a more competent QB. Don't get me wrong; I recognize that Stephen Garcia has had his moments. I also get that his shortcomings are largely of his own doing. However, if Garcia isn't the answer, then where are the other options? I'm probably beating a dead horse here, but you would think that a purported QB guru like Spurrier would have managed to recruit more SEC-caliber QBs during his time here. Despite numerous recruiting coups at other positions, though, Garcia and Chris Smelley are the only highly regarded prep QBs Spurrier has signed here, and there really hasn't been much talk of us landing many others. The thought that we almost certainly would have been a national title contender this year with a better QB under center has put a damper on my enthusiasm over the course of the season.
This is all to say that there is unfinished business at Carolina. And there are other unresolved issues, as well, such as the secondary and special teams problems. The staff and team proved that we can win more than seven games and that we can make it to Atlanta, but for these reasons they didn't win the big prizes and they didn't prove that we're capable of truly living up to our potential. The good news is that many key pieces are in place that will help us make another run in 2011. After what happened in 2010, though, the stakes are higher than they've ever been.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
In other news...
When did we switch places with the Georgia Bulldogs? They just lost in double-OT to Florida.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.
Sorry friend.
“Even the most pessimistic viewer has to look at how this season stacks up against history and view what we did as progress.”
Do I have to run through my opinions again? How about, “The majority of viewers look at how …”. Maybe you can even add the word “vast” before “majority” and it still be accurate, but I personally disagree our team as a whole made progress.
stuff 'bout stuff.
And here I was thinking that if I said it enough times, you'd eventually believe it.
I guess I should have said “even the most reasonable pessimistic viewer.” :-) Nine wins > seven. SECCG and CFA Bowl > Pizza Bowl.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Jan 26, 2011 9:48 AM EST up reply actions
No you didn't!!
No you didn’t go into reasons why you think that. Now, I have to go into reasons why I think the way I do. How many times have we had this conversation? Ha, ok here I go …
Yes, the offense improved, but the defense equally regressed. Even the few games where the defense played well, the offense stunk for some reason; usually ‘cause Garcia was missing key throws, or didn’t see open receivers. There were other reasons, though. I don’t want to put it all on Garcia. Some times the blocking was poor, the play calling was off, or the receivers were dropping balls. An improved offense + an equally regressed defense = the same quality product.
I believe the only reason we won two more games was ‘cause the division was worse than at any time since it was formed. We still pooped the post season in true Spurrier era fashion. All three East power house teams stunk, and we won two extra games. That doesn’t sound like much improvement. Yes, we defeated Alabama, but we typically win one game we shouldn’t on paper ever year. Yes, we played Auburn close the first time, but so did Clemson. That doesn’t mean they progressed. Plus, we got absolutely whooped all to pieces the second time.
I just don’t see it my fellow colleagues. I’d be calling for Spurrier’s resignation right now if the offense had once again been the thing holding us back. I’ll give him a pass this year, though, since it was primarily the defense. Next year, he has no excuses. He’s the head coach, and needs to be in charge of the whole team, or he should find a job as an offensive coordinator.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Jan 26, 2011 10:35 AM EST up reply actions
I don't disagree that Spurrier needs to be held accountable if we fail to win 10 games next year.
However, while I’ll grant that the defense regressed, I don’t buy the argument that the only reason we won was because the usual powers were down. Georgia and Tennessee were largely the very same teams as they were last year, difference being that they lost to us and ended up with one less win. Florida was definitely down, but it’s not like our game against them was some kind of stroke of luck in a creampuff war. We stomped them and looked like a top 10 team doing it. Instead of suggesting that the other powers were down, why not suggest that we surpassed them? Our goal all along has been to beat the East powers, and now that we’ve finally done it, I think we deserve credit for doing so.
And did the defense really regress? Or was it that the secondary regressed while the run defense improved? I don’t think the defense was overall much worse than in past years. Remember that in past years, we often performed well against teams with weak run games but got killed by teams that ran the ball well. It was the opposite this year. I would say the defense stayed the same overall while the offense improved.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Jan 26, 2011 11:30 AM EST up reply actions
I just have to disagree.
Georgia went 8-5 last year against a strength of schedule that was ranked 3rd of 120. This year, they went 6-7 against a strength of schedule that was ranked 37th. Georgia just didn’t look like they had it together early in the year, and that just happened to be where we played them. They were missing A.J. Green, were breaking in a freshman quarterback, and I don’t believe their defense had adjusted to their new scheme. I’m not saying we wouldn’t have beaten them later in the year, but I don’t think it was like playing them in the past.
Tennessee won an extra game last year when their strength of schedule was ranked 6th. This year it was ranked 40th. Like Georgia, they had a freshman quarterback who hurt them early on. Also, last year, Tennessee’s defense was much more highly ranked than this year’s squad.
Florida didn’t give us much of a game ‘cause they only tested our pass defense deep one or two times the whole day. Our pass defense was our team weakness, and it was exploited. I should note, however, that Florida came within one game of the East championship even though they had a completely inept offense for the majority of the season. What’s going to happen when that stabilizes? We’ll be right back where we started, unless we can improve as a whole team, not part of the team.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Jan 26, 2011 12:19 PM EST up reply actions
*... and it wasn't exploited.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Jan 26, 2011 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
Oh, I didn't see your last paragraph.
I have to disagree on that as well. Last year, our scoring defense was ranked 22nd. This year’s squad was ranked 46th. Recall, this was against the worst East division in history, and with an offense that was probably keeping the ball longer than in the past. I’d consider that a significant drop.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Jan 26, 2011 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
I'm going to address some of this in a longer post next time I get the chance to write one. Stay tuned! This conversation isn't over, after all.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Jan 26, 2011 7:47 PM EST up reply actions
Super.
I can further argue the point of the two lurkers out of two hundred that read this blog. Standing up for those without a voice!
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Jan 26, 2011 8:36 PM EST up reply actions
This be an official GABA constant.
Rather than having to repeat it after every post, how about we just recognize that Silver disagrees with any and all optimism unless otherwise specifically stated. It’s our version of one of Newton’s laws.
silver82blade squared still equals a positive number either way.
=D
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Jan 26, 2011 12:28 PM EST up reply actions

by 













