South Carolina at Mississippi State Preview: Quick Thoughts on USC's Defense
This post continues our series previewing Miss. St. Yesterday we talked about Carolina's offense.
--I think the key matchup in this game, or at least the one where we have a huge advantage that we can use to our gain, is probably our defensive line against Miss. St.'s offensive line. (FWtCBT agrees.) State has been plagued with injuries on the offensive line all year long, and the line's inability to get anything going against the league's better defenses has contributed immeasurably to State's current 0-3 league record. Against LSU, they lost stalwart G Tobias Smith for the year, and they are currently playing a freshman at center. The Bulldogs have not been able to protect their quarterbacks, and their vaunted rushing attack is having more and more trouble getting much going on the ground, too. They're 82nd in the nation in sacks allowed. This is all great news for Carolina. Melvin Ingram will be back to full strength this week, and I expect you're going to see Carolina getting after Chris Relf, Tyler Russell, and Vick Ballard early and often. State has some solid players at the skills positions, but if the line doesn't give them time for the plays to develop, they're going to have a lot of trouble.
--If the Bulldogs have trouble protecting Relf / Russell and opening running lanes for Ballard, you can expect they'll go to the quick passing game, which is a trademark of the Urban Meyer / Dan Mullen spread option. Ever since we went to playing more press coverages, I've really, really liked our ability to slow down opposing passing games. Our defensive backs and linebackers have been playing very physical ball, breaking through blocking schemes, and making plays on the ball. MSU obviously has better playmakers than Vandy and Kentucky, both of whom Carolina stuffed in the short passing game. However, MSU is probably no better than Auburn in this regard, and Carolina would have easily held the Tigers to under 300 total yards if not for all of the problems the offense had staying on the field that afternoon. I like our chances to hold MSU off if our defensive line establishes itself early in the game.
That's a wrap for tonight.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't know if they have named a starter yet but I am expecting a somewhat continuous QB rotation,
When Relf is in expect more option and short passes.
With Russell expect deeper passes and more dedicated runs.
Though Russell is not a real running threat he does makes good reads on option plays from what I have seen, so they will still run option plays with him.
And looking at the stats State allowed 6 sacks in the LSU game and 5 in the UGA game.
UGA, LSU, and South Carolina are all tied for 31st in the nation in sacks, looking like its gonna be a long day for States offense.
Oh look my tumblr, where you can find all my photoshops and other crap
Sanity is for the weak.
by RjTheMetalhead on Oct 13, 2011 10:13 PM EDT reply actions
Off topic..sorry
Hey everyone. Long time reader, first post.
I really enjoy the continually great material posted here. It keeps me in touch even though I now live in Phoenix…which brings me to my question.
Does anyone know how I can watch these SEC network games? I don’t get espn3, because my internet provider won’t play ball with ESPN…so I’m stuck…if I would hav known it initially, I would have never signed up for their service.
All ideas are welcome..I’m so pissed that I couldn’t watch Shaw light it up last week…please help!
by Gamecockaramaliciousness on Oct 14, 2011 1:23 AM EDT reply actions
We don't get the SEC network in NC either.
You can usually buy the game on ESPN Gameplan for $25 or watch it free on ESPN3.
Hard to disagree with anything in this post
To paraphrase Garcia, I’m completely baffled and flabbergasted to be honest with you that the line is only SC -3. I don’t really see where there is anything that MSU does better than us on either side of the ball. I think SC wins this by more than one touchdown.
Hey y'all, you should totes follow me on Twitter.<
I think there is still a lot of uncertainty about how both teams react to the QB/line changes.
Uncertainty doesn’t change the favorite, but it lowers the spread.
Yeah, I think that's right about the uncertainty.
I do think, though, that we have an advantage in this one. Our defense should be able to control this game, so we really only need an average-ish performance by Shaw and the offense to win this one. As long as Shaw doesn’t regress and make a bunch of mistakes, I think we win 27-14 or so.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Oct 14, 2011 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions
31st in the nation in sacks?
Clowney, Ingram and Taylor are spending more time in the backfield than opposing teams BACKS! How in the heck can they be thirty first?!
If this site showed defensive stats, our defense would OUTSCORE many backs, including SEC backs.
GO COCKS! This IS next year!
by criolle johnny on Oct 14, 2011 11:17 AM EDT reply actions
Zero sacks vs uk and ecu.
- FOW
by skandrewj62j on Oct 14, 2011 11:27 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It's a function of scheduling. We weren't able to get many sacks against ECU and Navy because of the offenses they run.
We’ll continue to rise from here on out. Heck, we might get 10 against UT.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Oct 14, 2011 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions
ECU is now 101st in the nation in sacks allowed.
Oh look my tumblr, where you can find all my photoshops and other crap
Lay off my crappy english, this means you Chloe.
by RjTheMetalhead on Oct 14, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Did they change their offense?
That’s unbelievable.
Yeah, I find that very surprising.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Oct 14, 2011 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions
ECU stats.
120th in rushing.
120th in turnovers.
118th in fumbles lost.
118th in interceptions thrown.
101st in sacks allowed.
116th in Scoring Defense.
Its been bad.
Oh look my tumblr, where you can find all my photoshops and other crap
Lay off my crappy english, this means you Chloe.
by RjTheMetalhead on Oct 14, 2011 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Not what I expected from them at all. Granted, you guys have had a brutal schedule thus far.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Oct 14, 2011 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Davis has struggled with pressure since he has been here.
But the loss of two senior starters to graduation and 2 starting linemen going down this season has only magnified his problems.
The defense has improved yardage wise in a big step forward but all of the turnovers are hurting bad.
Oh look my tumblr, where you can find all my photoshops and other crap
Lay off my crappy english, this means you Chloe.
by RjTheMetalhead on Oct 14, 2011 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Weird how that works. Both ECU and USC were supposed to have great offenses and questionable defenses, yet it's turned out the other way around.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Oct 14, 2011 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Well we couldn't do any worse than last year when we were 120th in rush D.
Right now we are sitting at 105th.
But the Pass D jumped from 107th to 59th.
And I just saw the injury list for tomorrows game and we have 5 starers allaround out.
Thank god its Memphis.
Oh look my tumblr, where you can find all my photoshops and other crap
Lay off my crappy english, this means you Chloe.
by RjTheMetalhead on Oct 14, 2011 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I think sacks is overrated as a stat
I think a better stat is “time QB has ball”. UKY didn’t take sacks, because he just threw the ball up for grabs when he was about to get sacked. A less kind commentator would refer to that as “Garcia-ing” the ball away, but we’re beyond that now.
I think that's spot on.
Sacks aren’t exactly an overrated stat, but certainly, the fact that we didn’t get any sacks against Kentucky doesn’t mean that our defensive line didn’t dominate the game. Newton was obviously careful to get rid of the ball, but he oftentimes did so in the most errant manners possible. Against Vandy, we got more sacks because Smith wasn’t good at getting rid of the ball, but the results were more or less the same; actually, UK’s refusal to take sacks probably led to a couple of turnovers.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Oct 14, 2011 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions
If you are in the Top-40 in the nation in sacks, chances are you hit the QB alot.
Oh look my tumblr, where you can find all my photoshops and other crap
Lay off my crappy english, this means you Chloe.
by RjTheMetalhead on Oct 14, 2011 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah
Sacks per pass attempt is really what we should be looking at.
Hey y'all, you should totes follow me on Twitter.<
Great Analysis
on both the offense and defense. I expect the offense will be more conservative v. msu on the road, expect some illegal procedures until the offense gets settled with those effing cowbells. The oline needs to hold its own and am worried given the past performances at home. The defense and special teams of the Cocks will win this game as Shaw continues to get more comfortable. Go Melvin- our second best option behind Lattimore.
Go Cocks, just win baby!

by 














