South Carolina at Tennessee Preview: Checking in on USC's Defense
This post continues our series previewing the UT game. Yesterday, we talked about USC's offense and UT's defense. Today, we're talking about our defense and the task it faces. Please note that you can also find tons of great info on the Vols at Rocky Top Talk. The guys over there do a fantastic job.
--The first thing that must be addressed is the case of Justin Worley, the Vols starting QB. There's been a lot of talk about Derek Dooley's choice to start Worley in this game. Many have lampooned the move, while others have touted Worley's prep honors and predicted success for the young Vol. Personally, I have no idea how Worley will perform. We've talked here about how Worley lacks mobility and has a weak arm, but those things may not matter much if he proves to be accurate in the mid-range game and makes good decisions. That alone would make him much better than the lamentable Matt Simms. That said, one thing that must be noted about Worley is that Dooley's choice to start him is a desperation move. Worley may have been playing well in practice, but that's not why he's starting. He's starting because Simms has been an utter trainwreck the past two weeks. Regardless of the defense you're playing against, you have to make routine passes, and Simms has failed to do that. I guess you could say that Connor Shaw got the start against Kentucky for similar reasons, but it's a bit different in Shaw's case. Shaw started the first game and has been considered a legitimate contender for playing time since he arrived. Not so with Worley, who came into the season third string and was never supposed to play. This is all to say that while Worley may play well, he doesn't exactly come in having had the stellar performances that suggest that he will. I'll leave it at that.
--One key factor coming into this game will be how the USC defense handles the Tennessee running game. Early in the season, the Vols running game was putrid. It actually registered negative rushing yards in its first two SEC games, against Florida and Georgia. Since then, though, it's improved a bit. Tauren Poole is a decent RB and always has been. What's changed is that a talented but very young Vols line has grown up a bit over the course of the season. Granted, "growing up" here means going from awful to not-quite-awful. Moreover, the running game has struggled in the second half in the last couple of games. Whatever the case may be, the Gamecocks should be in good shape if they can shut down UT's running game. I like our chances to tee off on Worley and force him to make some rookie mistakes if we can shut down the run on first and second down. Earlier in the season, the Vols survived poor rushing performances because they had the Tyler Bray-Justin Hunter connection to bail them out. Nos so these days.
--I hate that I have to talk about this, but it's become such an issue of the course of the season that it must be addressed: will the refs call offensive holding this week when the Vols offensive line tries to drag Melvin Ingram / Devin Taylor / Jadeveon Clowney down by the jersey? At this point, you really have to wonder what kind of numbers the guys can put up if they aren't held, since we haven't actually seen that this year. It would certainly be interesting if the refs call a couple early in the game.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Its interesting to see the shoe on the other foot.
For the better part of decades, UT has been favored in our annual Halloween match-ups, and with good reason. With a nationwide recruiting budget and a history of NFL caliber guys at QB, WR and RB (including Carolina’s assistant RB coach Jay Graham), they were deeper and better than us across the board. A typical USC-UT game was either an early blow-out, or watching South Carolina hang for a half until Tennessee’s superior depth and skill finally wore us down.
This is the first time I can remember USC being deeper and better than the Vols. And now its UT’s turn to being hoping for a “spark” and needing to notch an upset to make a stand. You’ve seen Dooley’s Vols play tough-as-nails for a half even without the loss of Tyler Bray …. against LSU (though the score board didn’t show), and against Bama; now they’re limping back home to play us with an untested QB. My how times have changed.
If we can protect the ball first and foremost then I think we should be ok. If we don’t however, maybe times haven’t changed so much. Tennessee still has the talent. They just don’t have the depth. Dooley may be a better pure coach that Fulmer (and there’s no doubt he’s 100x the man than Kiffin) but he doesn’t – yet- have that old Volunteer depth and he’s missing his star (Bray).
Of course we’re missing our star too. We’ve had a week to heal and get ready. How Spurrier calls this game will go a long way in answering the whispers about whether the game has passed him by and whether he can motivate his team.
Here's a health, Carolina, forever to thee! UNIVERSITAS CAROLIN MERID. 1801 Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros (Ovid)
Agreed.
Dead on with your assessment. Spurrier will call the game conservative, unless we make some big plays early and he feels more comfortable in opening things up. Would not be surprised to see another msu type game. Wilds is the key if he can break loose, then the Cocks break loose.
Go Cocks!
by wilmywoodcock on Oct 28, 2011 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Speed kills...
With or without the blatant clutching and grabbing our defensive front endured against Miss. St. i expect young Worley to experience much of his SEC debut on his hind end.
Thank you
I was beginning to think I had a gross misunderstanding of what constitutes holding. Or maybe they’re just doing away with the holding call altogether, because there seems to have been a lack of it all season. Maybe I’m just seeing it this year because our line is that good…its definitely been frustrating…especially when it nets the opponent a first down.
I was reading some comments from a UT coach (can’t remember who) about our D line. He was saying that we’re unique. When playing LSU and ‘Bama they had big guys that just eventually bully their way in. Whereas our guys are quicker and more athletic. So you may think you have them blocked and they’ll find a way to slide around you and run down the QB/RB or any other unfortunate soul they may give the ball to.
From SEC Headquarters
MEMORANDUM
FROM: CHIEF OF SEC OFFICIALS
TO: ALL SEC OFFICIALS
CC: COMMISSIONER MIKE SLIVE
RE: HOLDING PENALTIES
The following guidelines shall be in effect for the 2011 season concerning “holding”.
1. For Opponents of South Carolina.
Holding is in the eye of the beholder. If the OL has has hands on a USC defender, then he can’t possibly be holding. He’s just blocking. Even if the jersey pulls away or bunches in the OL’s hands, it’s still blocking. If the USC defender is dragged to the ground, that is his own damn fault. We simply have to recognize the fact that so-called “Holding” takes place on every play. Therefore, we should never call it. That wouldn’t be fair, would it?
PS – hands to the face is also completely acceptable also, especially if its UGA.
PPS – when we say “never call it”, see # 2 below.
2. For South Carolina.
Flag ’em for 10. Just like always.
Here's a health, Carolina, forever to thee! UNIVERSITAS CAROLIN MERID. 1801 Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros (Ovid)
I really wanted to attend this game.
Never made it to Knoxville. My friends went my senior year, but I was stuck working at Green’s.
And I am dying to go to Baton Rouge next year. If this 13 team schedule cancels the 2012 Carolina game at LSU, I will not be happy.
- FOW
almost gameday!
my heart is starting to pump a little faster.
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
listening to the post practice interviews on Thursday
Spurrier and Johnson both seemed pleased with the work they saw. Spurrier was even cracking jokes and has that mischievous look and tone to him. I think he’s got a few tricks up his sleeve for tomorrow’s game.
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.

by 













