Should Steve Spurrier Have Gone to Connor Shaw Sooner?
After watching Connor Shaw pick apart the Kentucky defense yesterday afternoon, lots of us are probably wondering whether or not Spurrier waited a week too long to give Shaw another chance. After all, Stephen Garcia had struggled to throw the ball accurately and make good decisions more or less all season, and to many of us, it was clear that a change needed to be after the Vanderbilt game, if, that is, there was another viable option. It's now clear that Shaw is a viable option. So why didn't Spurrier go to Shaw against Auburn? Word coming out of coming out of camp has been that Spurrier had decided to go with Garcia until the Gamecocks lost, but why would he do that, particularly considering how important that game was and it's import for what will likely be a tight SEC East race with Florida and Georgia?
This is just speculation on my part, but based on what we saw in the East Carolina game, I think there may be some lingering chemistry issues with Garcia and the rest of the team. Despite the fact that Spurrier thinks Shaw is the better QB and that Spurrier appears to be right based on yesterday's results, the team seemed more comfortable with Garcia in the game, despite Garcia's struggles. Garcia has been the starter for a very long time, and he's been with many of these players through thick and thin. He was one of the emotional center's of last season's breakthrough, after all. Therefore, some of the players may not have been comfortable with the switch to Shaw. However, once Garcia's play cost us a game, it was probably more clear to a lot of those players that a change needed to be made, and that they needed to rally behind the new QB. I think that's part of what you saw yesterday. Really, Shaw didn't play much differently than he did against ECU, save for the fact that he didn't fumble yesterday. However, the team looked more comfortable with him in the game, knowing that they needed to support him and that he's really the QB now. I'm not saying that Spurrier decided that he needed to throw a game to teach his players a lesson. I'm just saying that I think this situation presented some delicate issues and it wasn't going to be possible to make the change until it was the right time. That time was after the loss to Auburn, and the good news is that the team seems to have regrouped and is prepared to make a run now.
Because of Garcia's importance to the team as an emotional cog, I would like to see us try to get him involved in some way, if he's interested in playing a secondary role on the team, that is. Although he's passed the ball poorly this year, he is running it extremely well, and I think it could be beneficial to the team--both strategically and emotionally--if we install some non-passing packages for Garcia. He could play the kind of role Tim Tebow played for Florida in 2006, coming in to gut out first downs and to run the ball in on the goal line. I think he'd be very effective in that role.
As far as whether he'll start at primary QB again, I think he's probably done. Connor played as well yesterday as I've seen Garcia play outside of last year's Alabama game, and Connor is a sophomore who will improve with experience. Garcia, on the other hand, has had five years and a million second chances, and what we have with him is the QB you saw against Auburn. I know that there are some Carolina fans out there who still seem to see Garcia as the team's QB and want him back in the starter's role as soon as possible, but really, folks, there's been no evidence over the course of his career that Garcia is capable of consistently playing at a high level, and after yesterday, there's abundant evidence that we have a better option. Don't let your loyalty to a player blind you to the facts in this situation. To be honest, I see the idea that Garcia should be the starter as an idea so absurd as to be almost below the dignity of response. I wish Garcia all the best from here on out and thank him for the effort he's put into this program and some of the big wins he's been a part of. I'll just leave it at that; hopefully that's my final word on the QB controversy for the year, because I see it as being over.
19 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Excellent post.
I think you unraveled what had been a mystery to me. I thought Spurrier was simply being stubborn. But your explanation makes a lot more sense.
Here's a health, Carolina, forever to thee! UNIVERSITAS CAROLIN MERID. 1801 Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros (Ovid)
Honestly, as much as I hate having lost to Auburn, I think this worked out well.
The team knew after that game that a change needed to be made. The change was made, and it worked splendidly, partially because of the quality of the opponent. Now, the team believes in Connor, and Connor himself has some confidence heading into next week.
I really think we’re set up well to go on a huge tear.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Oct 9, 2011 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Hmmmmm. I'm going to have to reserve comment on whether the loss to Aubie has a silver lining
Even if your explanation fits the known facts, Spurrier should still have benched Garcia in third quarter when he was picked by Thorpe on a (highly ill advised) long ball.
Here's a health, Carolina, forever to thee! UNIVERSITAS CAROLIN MERID. 1801 Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros (Ovid)
Yeah, I know I have a perverse view on this. We can revisit the argument later in the season. If we win out, Spurrier may end up looking like a genius in player psychology. If we miss out on Atlanta by one game...well, you get the idea.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Oct 9, 2011 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Meh. I would have played Connor after the Vandy game.
to answer your post, I think yes he should have gone sooner. But, I am sure he has his reasons. I just hope it works itself out in the end and we beat Arky, Florida and Clemson.
- FOW
by skandrewj62j on Oct 10, 2011 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Great post
Like I said last week, I think this game/opponent was perfect for Shaw stepping in and taking over. I hope this gives the offense some confidence they can take on the road the next few weeks.
It's a pretty unbelievable scenario really
you get to plug in your new starter at home against a lower-division team (UK), and he has a great, confidence-building game – all his mistakes are coachable. Next he gets to travel to a hostile stadium, but it’s against a team (MSU) who has been struggling for the own identity too. Couldn’t have scripted it better if you needed to make a mid-season switch at QB.
Here's a health, Carolina, forever to thee! UNIVERSITAS CAROLIN MERID. 1801 Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros (Ovid)
I think you are spot-on in this writeup.
more on having Garcia in the game, what if we moved Marcus around, and had both QBs back there on some plays? the center would snap it to one or the other, and either one can throw or run with it.
idk, i guess that’s whacky
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
whacky but interesting
I wonder how Garcia would block, though. He’s a big, tough guy. Who knows. Would you let Garcia throw the ball right now, even if you found some job for him on the field?
Here's a health, Carolina, forever to thee! UNIVERSITAS CAROLIN MERID. 1801 Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros (Ovid)
i wouldn't let him on the field, personally.
but, i imagine he’ll play some if connor struggles mightily in some game.
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
Based on what we’ve seen so far Spurrier probably should have kicked Garcia off team when he had the chance this off season and put his confidence in Shaw as the starting QB.
by electricblue on Oct 10, 2011 6:43 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions
I was wondering that, too
but if we’d struggled with Connor, we’d be kvetching about why Spurrier gave Garcia the boot.
Imagine this mind game … instead of separating Garcia for the team, Spurrier suspends him for five games for the “leadership meeting” brouhaha. Are we 5-0 when we face Kentucky if Connor starts against ECU, Georgia, Navy, Vanderbilt and Auburn?’
Connor looked shaky in his last series against the Pirates (not to mention everyone turning the ball over – including Connor). But I think he would have rallied (along with the team) in the 2nd quarter and second half.
Against Georgia? I don’t know. Garcia looked very shaky at times, but he delivered some of the plays he made himself known (and loved for) over the past two seasons. That really is a toss-up in my mind.
I think we beat the Navy and Vanderbilt with Connor Shaw. Probably by much wider margins (it’s clear the Mids really got themselves stoked up to play us, considering that Southern Miss just absolutely blew them off the field in Annapolis this past Saturday. I completely believe that we beat Auburn if Connor plays the whole game (or even the second half).
So if we’re sitting at 5-0 or 4-1 … would people have been calling for a suspended Stephen to start? Would his head be in a better place? A worse place? About where it is now? My hunch is that Spurrier would have let Shaw start … we probably would have seen Garcia come on in the third quarter. How would he have fared against a hapless, worn down ’Cat D? Or would be airing it out so much if Connor had been playing well the previous five games?
Here's a health, Carolina, forever to thee! UNIVERSITAS CAROLIN MERID. 1801 Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros (Ovid)
i don’t think there’s any way Garcia would have been benched this season, not after what he did last year in terms of overall production. he had one of the best seasons in school history.
but if he were, i agree that we probably lose to Georgia. i didn’t think we would go undefeated this season even if we played our best. in my mind, i had Arkansas circled as a probable loss. now that we’ve lost a game we should have won and still have to face the Hogs, its gonna be a tough road. Georgia has questions on offense, but so do we. shaw had a great game, but we haven’t seen enough yet.
if we run the table though, i see us having a fighting chance to beat whoever shows up in Atlanta. that would mean shaw had half a season of maturing, and beating at least 2 quality opponents in Ark and Clem.
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
SEC Offensive Player of the Week
Smell the glove!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
by Gamecock'n'Balls on Oct 10, 2011 10:26 AM EDT reply actions
Can someone let me in on the smell the glove meme?
I know that “Smell the Glove” is a Spinal Tap album….I have seen it dropped in relation to Shaw’s performance against KY. Any particular reason?
Shaw wears a glove on his throwing hand.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
by Gamecock'n'Balls on Oct 10, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions

by 















