Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bob Sapp Denies Throwing Fights

South Carolina Football: A Little Perspective

130774678_extra_large

I've noticed that there's been a striking amount of negativity surrounding USC's program over the past few weeks. Most of the negativity has been directed towards Steve Spurrier and his management of the offense this season. Some are even stating that we should be considering looking elsewhere for a head coach. I realize this is a minority position I'm addressing, but I feel that it should be addressed here.

First of all, it's obviously true that there's something wrong with the offense, and Spurrier deserves some criticism, as I'm sure he'd be the  first to admit. I don't know what's wrong with the offense. It seems like something different each week: early in the season, it was not running the ball enough. Then, it was Stephen Garcia struggling to throw the ball. Then, the offensive line began to collapse. Some weeks the line can't pass block, some weeks it can't run block. There are also continued headscratchers from a playcalling standpoint. Whatever the case may be, it's clear that our offense is dysfunctional right now, and Spurrier deserves some of the blame. He's the de facto offensive coordinator, so it's his responsibility for the team to field a good offense.

That said, there's no need to call for Spurrier's head. While Spurrier is responsible for the offense, he's more so, as the head coach, responsible for the team as a whole, and right now, Spurrier has us winning football games. Yes, we're winning with Ellis Johnson's defense rather than Spurrier's offense. So what? I've heard a few people suggest that Spurrier doesn't deserve credit for Johnson's defense. I disagree. Who hired Johnson? Who hired Lorenzo Ward and Brad Lawing, whose defensive backs and defensive linemen, respectively, are having standout years? Spurrier did, of course; he made good choices, and the coaches were more likely to come here and want to stay for the chance to coach with a legend. Spurrier is also responsible for taking the recruiting culture at South Carolina to the next level. No, he's not always the guy closing on the recruits, but he is the guy who hired our all-star recruiters, and he's an attraction to top recruits. The results speak for themselves.

Continue reading after the jump.

Star-divide

We may not be winning pretty, but we're winning. At 7-1 with a game against The Citadel slated after Florida, we're certain to win at least eight games. Based on a historical bar that we've yet to prove that we can maintain with any level of consistency, that's success. Moreover, I would say that it's highly likely that we're going to win at least nine, perhaps ten games. We'll be favored against Florida, and the Clemson game will likely be a push. Arkansas will be tough, but it's certainly a winnable game if we play our best. How often have we been in a position at this point in the season to win 11 regular-season games? Does a program that's in the position to achieve that kind of historical success deserve to be dismissed as a failure? The idea seems ridiculous to me. And this is to say nothing of the numerous firsts Spurrier has accomplished here: he won our first SEC East title, he turned the tide in several rivalry series, etc. Lately, he broke our record for consecutive road wins. The list could go on.

This is just speculation, of course, but I think there are two things that have happened this year that have made some portions of the fanbase unnecessarily critical of Spurrier. The first is the Garcia situation. Unfortunately, there are some USC fans who want to blame everyone but Garcia for consequences Garcia brought upon himself. Spurrier is a particular object of their ire. All I can say directly to that is that it doesn't make any sense. Moreover, some of the offense's problems (although perhaps not as much as we originally thought) are definitely attributable to Garcia's regression, and I'm willing to wager that Spurrier couldn't have done anything to have prevented whatever was ailing Garcia. This is one offensive problem that I don't think should be blamed on Spurrier, and it's one that I think he deserves a bit of a pass on.

The second thing that I think is driving fan unrest is the success the Tigers are experiencing in the Upstate. I've heard a number of people say things to the effect of, "If Clemson can have a high-profile offense with their talent, why can't we with preseason All-SEC selections like Garcia, Marcus Lattimore, and Alshon Jeffery?" What I would say here is that we should worry about our own business before worrying about Clemson's. We can't control Clemson, and neither can Spurrier; in fact, in the one way Spurrier can control Clemson, in-state recruiting, Spurrier has had mountains of success. And anyways, the Tigers will be our business soon enough, and if we can beat a good Clemson, the victory will be that much sweeter. I'd also say that while Clemson's offense has made it a media darling this season, I think it's numbers have been inflated by the atrocious state of ACC defense and that we're going to be able to slow the Tigers down. Let this situation play out before you freak out over Clemson.

At the end of the day, though, I think we all need a bit of historical perspective. We're in a veritable golden age of USC football, and Steve Spurrier has been a large part of what brought us here. He doesn't deserve to be fired; he deserves to be thanked for being the most successful head coach who has ever coached here.

Comment 24 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good thoughts

I was just talking to my good friend I go to the games with about this same thing. We have had a tidal wave of consistent improvement in this program since Spurrier has come to Columbia. We are very fortunate to have him. Yes things aren’t perfect but things are good. Plus on your Tater thoughts I agree I believe its a frustrating for them to get so much attention so quickly compared to how we have to chop wood every week. But that’s the price we pay for being in a elite conference. Just remember all keep things in perspective. As they say its Great to be a Gamecock.

by Cokadoodledoo on Nov 2, 2011 12:24 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

IMO...

Clemson is prone to getting more love than us because they’re one of the few football schools in the ACC. When they’re doing well, the talking heads actually have material to play with and get excited about. On the other hand, it’s hard to justify squeezing in South Carolina when we’re absolutely surrounded by powerhouses. Clemson doing well automatically benefits the ACC and boosts its profile, while us performing well just takes away from Alabama/LSU/Florida chatter. The SEC market isn’t in need of a savior, in other words.

by RumblinFish on Nov 2, 2011 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great post. In regard to Clemson...

…they are absolutely the beneficiaries of a favorable schedule. It’s ironic, really, since many Clemson fans last year accused us of beating up on a bad division when they’re doing the same thing right now. In their (and our) defense, you can’t help your in-conference schedule; you gotta play who they put in front of you. In Clemson’s case, their signature wins (Auburn, Virginia Tech, Florida State) are pretty much all ringing hollow at this point in the season. True, Auburn and VT are gaining back some respect for themselves, but FSU, Clemson’s only true competition in the Atlantic and an alleged top five team, is a dumpster fire right now. Don’t even get me started on noted juggernauts like N.C. State and Wake Forest. In all reality, Clemson should be in the ACCG at least every other year.

That said, our defense will, by far, be the best Clemson sees. FSU’s might have given it a run for our money if they’d had all their players, but that was a depleted unit that took the field against the Tigers. To Clemson’s credit, they have some phenomenal skill players — as they always have — and they are utilizing them much better than they have in the past. But they’re also playing against some terrible d-lines, and any QB can make sensational throws when he has three whole days in the pocket. GT managed to consistently pressure Boyd, and suddenly, he looked like a mortal again.

So yeah, I understand why fellow fans are upset. Ours was supposed to be the dream season; Clemson’s was supposed to be a year of struggle. And while we’re 7-1, it feels like we’ve gone through one hell of a emotional roller coaster. I get it. But I’m with you: Let’s not throw our guys — or coaches — under the bus. We’ve won a lot of games that we would have lost in just about any other season. OK, so we’re winning with ball control and great defense instead of putting up style points with 300+ yards a game in offense. So what? Winning is winning, and I’ll take it every time. Besides, stout defense plus a reliable running game looks pretty damn SEC to me.

by RumblinFish on Nov 2, 2011 12:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed on all points. Good post.
Ours was supposed to be the dream season; Clemson’s was supposed to be a year of struggle.

That’s what’s really irking a lot of us right now.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Nov 2, 2011 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'd really prefer to not talk about Clemson or their schedule

We are doing a heck of a job to win these game. And UGA fans can consult their in-house derpitologist to explain how they lost to us, and Tennessee fans can keep holding onto the past but at the end of the day we are beating the teams in front of us. And Clemson fans can rank us 24th or not rank us at all for all I care. We’ll have our time to settle it on the field with them. But please, let’s not compare schedules when they beat an Auburn team that beat us. When they beat FSU, who beat us in a bowl game last year. I understand the frustration, but really all that matters in this SEC game we have this weekend. And thank god Arkansas at least looks beatable now. I’m not predicting a win, but I certainly have hope that we can pull this off.

As far as Spurrier, my only thought on him is an uncertainty as to how much longer he wants to be a head coach and hoping that when he leaves we will be able to find another good guy to be our head coach. Although, thanks to Spurrier’s recruiting and Hyman’s improvement of the facilities, USC will be a much more desirable location in the years to come for recruits and coaches.

Sorry for being devil’s advocate on the Clempson stuff, but damn it feels good to have back-to-back wins over UGA and UT in 2010 and 2011.

GO Cocks!!

- FOW

by skandrewj62j on Nov 2, 2011 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

fwiw

I’m not worried about the Clemson situation at all right now, nor have I been. They play flashy, they have an excitable coach, they have a great home crowd, they beat some (what was thought of as at the time) good teams…of course they’re going to get the press. Good for them. We don’t play flashy, we win ugly and lost to a decent but not great Auburn. Plus, all the off-field stuff. Maybe, I tend to think more like a player, but I really don’t think about much more than 1 game at a time. We have a long ways to go to become a true powerhouse. When I got to USC we had just finished two winless seasons…lol.

Spurrier has done a great job, anyone who doubts that or thinks someone else could have come here and done better is delusional. The better days are ahead for us as we continue to get better recruits and players and establish our relevance more and more. I definitely notice a change in culture of the program in the last few years. Bigger expectations, better experience and knowledge of how to win and continue to win games as a team. It is very hard to reverse a tsunami of mediocrity this program has shown since it joined the SEC. But we are beginning to experience that, and Spurrier is 90% of the reason why to this point in time. We should all be grateful, really.

Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.

by walknbalk on Nov 2, 2011 2:56 AM EDT reply actions  

it's even more of a mystery

After the UT game, I can honestly say that our offense clumbsiness is a total mystery. The play calling seemed okay but the execution was as if this was the first time they’d run the play. I may have wanted to question Spurrier, but not anymore. I’m beginning to feel sorry for him.

But, universally, I think we all know that, as weird as it sounds, this team is capable of a magical display of football prowess…in spite of what they’ve done in the past. Maybe give up the decaf.

As to Clemson, aside from the fact that they had not played any really good teams until last Saturday…the media is fascinated by their boy-like, hyperactive coach. Burning the candle at both ends makes a helluva light, but not for long.

by gungadin on Nov 2, 2011 8:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think you are way off base

I have been reading a lot of the blogging and there has been some criticism but I have yet to read where one Gamecock fan has call for SOS’s dismissal. Criticise is what people do and when you factor in emotion well they really like to chime in. And to be honest the fans have a right to voice their opinions as they see fit. If you wanted to talk about the Gamecock fans jealousy of Clemsux success do not tie it to an article claiming Gamecock fans want to get rid of SOS. A little less of your moral Gamecock high ground and a little more football field discusion makes for better reading.

by James Keith on Nov 2, 2011 9:59 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm not saying you can't criticize. This board encourages criticism. In fact, this article itself blames the bad offense on Spurrier.

That said, I’ve read plenty of people calling for SOS’s dismissal. It usually doesn’t happen in the outright form of calling for his head; most people are intelligent enough to know that there’s 0% chance of that actually happening. It’s usually more like, “I’d be happy if he moved on. We’d be better off looking elsewhere.” That’s what I’m responding to. I guess I’m also responding to more general negativity. I think it’s fair to criticize the program, but I also think it’s important to recognize that we’ve had a good year up to this point.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Nov 2, 2011 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dead On.

Spurrier makes the best of what he has, period. He does not have the talent to chuck it all over the field with the oline we have. However, he has raised the recruiting to a level never seen in Columbia. We will beat the taters, they have not seen team speed on defense like this all year.
I also agree with skandrew-I worry that the old ball coach will pack it in before we reach the top of the mountain. He seems to have the desire and drive, he needs the francise qb and an oline to finish the task. I remember when Bobby Bowden entered his sixties, and if you look at his record during that decade, Free Shoes U was a consistent 10 win and national title contender every year.
People who knock the ball coach really have no clue what they are talking about, period.

by wilmywoodcock on Nov 2, 2011 6:13 PM EDT reply actions  

While I respect your opinion, I can't say I wholly agree, Gamecock Man.

In seven years as our offensive co-ordinator I can’t recall a time when I felt confident in the ability of our offense to score points. I can’t recall a time that our offense had an identity, either. It’s no secret that we’ve been winning with Ellis Johnson’s defense these past 3 or so years. We’ve actually been winning in spite of an offense that routinly turns the ball over DEEP in our own territory. And this with two Heisman quality skill players on the side lines.(And I’m not willing to give much credit to Lorenzo Ward and his defensive backs, yet. The real difference between this year and last year is the addition of Jadeveon Clowney, Kelcy Quarels, and an even more mature Devin Taylor and Melvin Ingram. If you’ll notice we rarely rush more than four, which allows us to drop more guys into pass coverage. I’m not sure the defensive backs have gotten better so much as they’ve gotten more help this year. If I were going to commend a position for their improvement, it would be our linebacking corps, which has tackled well and gotten to the ball quickly all season.)

But I digress. Spurrier hasn’t instilled an offense at South Carolina. As a program buidling I think he’s done a marvelous job bridging the gap between Lou Holtz and whoever comes after Spurrier, but as an offensive coordinator he’s been more Zook than Meyer.

Of course Spurrier deserves some of the credit for bringing top tier coaches like Ellis Johnson and Brad Lawing, but he also brought in Tyrone Nix, John Hunt, and David Reeves. Spurrier has done a lot in the way of “program-building.” In that vein, though, I don’t think you just settle on a guy who has done a pretty darn good job when you’re building a program. You look for the guy that can do the best job. Why can’t I expect a competant offense from Steve Spurrier? I guess what I’m wondering is, what could happen if we promoted Ellis Johnson to head coach and found an offensive coordinator who actually had some success over the last seven years? I’m looking forward to taking the next step, not getting rid of Spurrier. It just so happens that one necessitates the other.

Dum spiro spero - "While I breathe, I hope"
State motto of South Carolina

by The Feathered Warrior on Nov 2, 2011 11:01 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I don't disagree with anything you've said about the lack of consistency on offense.

I do, though, think that Spurrier deserves a lot of credit for all the success he’s had as a program builder. In fact, I think he should be primarily judged based on the overall state of the program, as opposed to the offense. In that regard, he’s engineered a number of notable firsts, as you know. I, too, think that the potential is there for even greater success after Spurrier retires. However, barring a horrendous collapse, I also think Spurrier has earned the right to go out his way. I also worry that if we were to can Spurrier, we become viewed as a lose-lose situations that would scare away good coaching prospects.

BTW, you should be careful what you wish for regarding Johnson as head coach. He was an abysmal failure as the head coach at The Citadel. Some coaches are great coordinators but simply aren’t cut out for head coaching. Johnson may be one of those coaches. Head coaching takes leadership and managerial qualities that aren’t necessarily possessed by guys with good minds for football. Spurrier has these qualities, which is why he’s managed to succeed in a job that was considered black hole for years and years.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Nov 2, 2011 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Recommended

Can’t remember a time when anyone so clearly stated my thoughts

by rondo(jesus) on Nov 5, 2011 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Spurrier really don't believe in us!!

Look sense everyone else is afraid to speak on it and call it like it is, I will. Spurrier doesn’t believe in these players as much as say Oregon coach believes in his players. I know that is left field but what I’m saying is, he doesnt thinkmsouth Carolina gamecocks are good enough. I don’t think he believe in south Carolina period. Case in point, how do you let the qb who broke almost all of our state high school qb records leave out the state without recruiting him (Justin worley-ut)? Feel me!! I have soooo much respect respect for Lou hotly because he believed in our players and south Carolina, the state, he didn’t hAve an attitude as to where he was bigger than us as a state. But in the same breath, I really Appreciate the recruiting spurrier has brought to our downtrodden footballmprogrMs. I really do. He is a hell of a recruiter minus the Worley mess up. But since u have nick jones, ace sanders, Bruce Ellington , damiere Byrd, and Mr. Alshon Jeffrey, we shoul not have such a horrendous passing game. I’m sorry, bad oline or not, spurrier need to call quicker plays, we have so many playmaking wide receiver, and definitely didn’t mention Moore or barnes, who drops ball. I had an argument with an lsu fan saying I should be happy we’re 7—, and that well go 9-3, 8-4, so just enjoy. Needless to say everyone expects south Carolina to fail, and I even think spurrier expects that, that’s why he doesn’t call better plays. We have a competent qb who might hold the ball tomlong, but u tell menif Connor Shawn likely complete short routes all the time And shout out to wilds, knew he was goin over 100

by Poloregal on Nov 2, 2011 11:29 PM EDT reply actions  

We didn't recruit Worley because Worley doesn't fit what we're doing on offense and because Worley would have never come here. He wanted to go to UNC or UT.

I do agree that we need to run quicker plays. No way to know whether Spurrier “believes in us,” though.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Nov 2, 2011 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Worley mess up?

Did he accidentally send Worley a postcard, thus wasting 30 seconds that could have been spent on an SEC caliber player?

"Lattimore, as the kids can say, can ball, and sometimes does it to the extent one might say [he] is out of control in his balling." - Spencer Hall

by GwinnettGamecock on Nov 2, 2011 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Missed

What I’m saying about Worley is, that whether he’s Sec caliber, at least u should know about a qb who’s breaking all of sc’s state records. It’s like this. The rest of college football world don’t think sc as a state pumps out football players. So here goes the thinking" oh a qb who broke all sc state reocords?, he just from sc, oh well"" and that’s how I believe spurrier thinks of us a’s a state. He doran believe in us. Period. We have the talented receivers, I feel as tho we have the best wr Corp in the sec. And I’m not being biased at all

by Poloregal on Nov 3, 2011 9:03 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about South Carolina Gamecocks.

Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Uscgamecocks_small Gamecock Man

Authors

Sir_big_spur_small The Feathered Warrior

Images_small GwinnettGamecock

South_carolina_gamecocks_4_small skandrewj62j

Ape-rogers-g-sc-8x10_small tryptic67

Roflbot_small Connor Tapp

Dscn2426_small Gamecock'n'Balls