South Carolina Promotes Lorenzo Ward to Defensive Coordinator
As Gwinnett and others have already mentioned, USC has promoted Lorenzo Ward to defensive coordinator. I'll have to admit that I have been one of those who would have liked to see us make a splashy hire, such as Mike Stoops or Ron Zook. However, in the end, I think promoting Ward is a good move.
First things first, Ward has been a very solid position coach at Carolina. A lot of folks were down on him for how the secondary performed last year, but that was a young group of players, and we had no depth. One year later and with a more experienced, deep roster of defensive backs, Ward's group was one of the best in the country. That speaks to Ward's ability to coach up a talented-but-raw group of players.
Ward is also an excellent recruiter who has made deep inroads in Georgia's backyard; up until now, it has been unthinkable for us to go toe to toe with UGA for Peach State talent, but that's changing, partially due to Ward.
Moreover, Ward has been given more than the average space to develop his coordinator skills while coaching under Ellis Johnson, so he's more ready than the average position coach to take on head man duties. Although Ward doesn't have a lot of experience doing it, Spurrier and Johnson think he's ready to call plays, and if they think he's ready, he probably is.
There are some other things to keep in mind here, too. At most, it's hard to see Steve Spurrier coaching more than four or five more seasons. That being the case, Spurrier probably isn't interested in bringing in someone like Stoops or Zook, who would likely bolt for an opportunity to get back into a head-coaching position. Spurrier doesn't want the headache of an unstable coaching staff as he moves into the end-game of his coaching staff.
And it's not just the personal headaches that worry Spurrier. If that was all this is about, I would be against the move. But there's also the issue of maintaining continuity in approach. Ward is well-prepared to continue running Johnson's 4-2-5 scheme. That's the scheme we've recruited for over the past few years, and if we changed styles now, there would likely be a two-or-three year transition period. That would mean that Spurrier would waste the last few years of his career here fielding defenses with unsuitable personnel. Promoting Ward means we can continue to run the scheme that we've recruited for, and considering that we've recruited pretty well at the key spur position and have a talented potential commit--Jordan Diggs--who can play the position, this is probably a move well-suited to maintaining a high level of defensive play. On the personnel note, it should also be remembered that promoting Ward can't hurt with Stephon Gilmore's decision on whether or not to return next year; Gilmore has a good relationship with Ward.
The question now is who USC brings in to coach the linebackers. Hopefully, USC gets someone who's good with fundamentals and who can recruit his tail off.
Programming note: I'm still traveling for the holidays, so expect posting to continue being somewhat sporadic. I do plan to get something up on the schedule over the next few days, as well as final previews for the Capital One Bowl.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bob Stoops first chance to run a defense was when Spurrier hired him at Florida
Though Spurrier showed too much loyalty to some of his initial staff, all of his replacements have been great hires – so much so that we have trouble keeping them. Two have left for HC jobs, and one was hired away by his alma mater.
Everyone that knows Ward seems to think he is ready, and he was likely to leave in 2012 or 2013 if he was passed over for an outside hire. I think this was the right move, and I hope the continuity will pay off on the field next year. It’s a minor point, but I expect the D will be fired up to play for Ward in Orlando.
"Lattimore, as the kids can say, can ball, and sometimes does it to the extent one might say [he] is out of control in his balling." - Spencer Hall
by GwinnettGamecock on Dec 28, 2011 4:37 PM EST reply actions
Those are excellent points. The truth is that Ward is at the point in his career when it makes sense for him to take a promotion.
A few people have compared this move to Holtz promoting Charlie Strong to DC. The two situations aren’t exactly commensurate, as we’re now in a better position to make the splashy hire than we were then. That said, in other ways, they’re very similar situations: like Strong, Ward now has a good history as a position coach and has proven everything he can in that regard. He’s a good prospect for DC, and he would do it elsewhere if not here. That, combined with the other intangibles in this situation, means that this is a solid move. We of course can’t know if Ward will have the unmitigated success Strong has had, but he certainly brings comparable credentials, which portends success.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Dec 28, 2011 5:27 PM EST up reply actions
I think Ward will be a strong DC...
… and I intend to hate him for it for years and years to come.
I was kind of excited for that splashy hire too.
But I think this is the right move. Continuity in scheme and recruiting is big and it seems as if the players rally around him. Congrats to Ward
Way off here
But Georgia wins as far as scheduling goes come on Auburn and Old Miss again!! And got the South Carolina game moved to Oct 6 maybe if we clean their clock next year in Columbia they’ll want it moved back to Sept!! My gosh they whine just as much as Clemson fans do!!! Give me a break we have LSU Arkansas this is getting old very old! They once again got the easiest Sec east schedule once again!! So Go DAWGS!!! You got a lot to cheer for!!!!!
by pchappel on Dec 28, 2011 6:34 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Just got banned from the Georgia Site
For trying to make a point but that’s typical they can insult me but I can’t insult them typical Georgia fan!! And a site run by nothing but Georgia fans!!
by pchappel on Dec 29, 2011 12:20 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
And we're the whiners?

http://sportsandgrits.com/
by Mr. Sanchez on Dec 29, 2011 11:41 AM EST up reply actions
DawgSports doesn't ban very often
I understand why they took that step. It’s best to keep such direct criticisms on South Carolina boards.
"Lattimore, as the kids can say, can ball, and sometimes does it to the extent one might say [he] is out of control in his balling." - Spencer Hall
by GwinnettGamecock on Dec 29, 2011 3:00 PM EST up reply actions
I think I speak for all of the authors here when I say
That we would prefer if our members and fellow fans were not banned from other SB Nation sites. While we’ve seen some considerable growth, SB Nation is still a relatively small community. That’s what we love about it. I don’t want to get into whether you deserved a ban because, frankly, it’s a moot issue.
Right or not, getting banned is usually an indication that the tone of discourse has crossed out of the realm of constructive and fun into something more sinister. It is literally impossible to determine who threw the proverbial “first stone” in these situations, but we expect our members to stop throwing stones altogether rather than focusing on whose was the first. There are plenty of places around the internet where we fans can go to talk smack, trade barbs , or insult rivals. I don’t count this space among them. I regret that you were insulted, but we try to hold our members to a standard above “tit for tat.”
Dum spiro spero - "While I breathe, I hope"
State motto of South Carolina
by The Feathered Warrior on Dec 29, 2011 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
Learned a lesson
Won’t post things on other team pages especially when things are taken the wrong way. All I said was Georgia got the easier of the Sec East again on top of the game with us being moved to Oct and all went to pot after that. Maybe I shouldn’t have said Go DAWGS oh well I’m not crying any tears over it. But yes learned a lesson. Can someone please tell me what a Troll is? That’s what I was being called after my comments. If I offended any Georgia fans I’m so sorry that wasn’t my intentions.
by pchappel on Dec 29, 2011 6:32 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
from wiki
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
http://sportsandgrits.com/
by Mr. Sanchez on Dec 29, 2011 10:26 PM EST up reply actions
You may have been a troll
but doesn’t mean if someone calls you one that you are one. Some fans are super sensitive lol
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
Yes, some fans are insanely sensitive
http://sportsandgrits.com/
by Mr. Sanchez on Dec 29, 2011 10:27 PM EST up reply actions
Oh ok
Thanks for the info. What do you guys think about the upcoming bowl game? Any predictions?
by pchappel on Dec 29, 2011 8:55 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
I'm cautiously optimistic about our chances in the bowl game.
Losing Ellis Johnson makes me nervous, but think we’ll be able to perform well given our talent on defense. The real question is which Carolina offense will show up. I’d like to think the one that whipped Clemson.
Dum spiro spero - "While I breathe, I hope"
State motto of South Carolina
by The Feathered Warrior on Dec 29, 2011 10:04 PM EST up reply actions
http://www.garnetandblackattack.com/2011/12/28/2667548/capital-one-bowl-probabilities
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
Loosing Ellis Johnson
Makes me nervous to really nervous just hope our defense plays like it did against Clemson. And I do have more faith in our offense with Shaw running it than Garcia. But win or loose it’s been a Great Year To Be A GAMECOCK FAN! But would love to see 11-2 if I’m not mistaken I think that would be the 1st time in Carolina Football history we won 11 games. Go Cocks beat Nebraska!! But would also like to wish Nebraska the best of luck also. Enjoy reading all of your post and responses to my questions I’m new at all this so again thanks to you all. Have a safe and Happy New Year.
by pchappel on Dec 30, 2011 1:30 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
pchappel...
Sorry you got banned at Dawg Sports. I’d echo what Gwinnett has said—I didn’t read your post at Dawg Sports, but it’s best to mind your Ps and Qs when at rivals teams’ blogs. There are things you can say around here that probably shouldn’t be said at those sites, particularly sites like Dawg Sports that have a certain culture in the comments section with which your comments might not fly.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
Great Point
Being a newcomer to this, I find amusing and baffling that uga fans visit our site especially to argue moot points, such as we beat them two years in a row and everybody familiar with the SEC knows that uga lucked out on another easy schedule. In other words, they need to mind their ps and qs while they are in our house. Enough said.
by wilmywoodcock on Dec 30, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I'm probably a bit more tolerant of rogue posters than Dawg Sports is. That said, I've unfortunately had to threaten a couple of the UGA fans with bans.
I’m not generally too offended by their shtick, but it’s important not to let the conversations devolve into meaningless bickering and smack talk. As FW said above, keeping a high level of discourse is one of the hallmarks of SB Nation.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Dec 30, 2011 4:02 PM EST up reply actions
Tell that to Hogbody
Had to throw out some disparaging remarks to that clown, so I stooped to his level. That being said, have notified him that any further posts will be ignored by me. It is best to use planned ignoring of negative behaviors by children, maybe they will stop.
by wilmywoodcock on Dec 30, 2011 4:06 PM EST up reply actions
He's one of the ones I gave a warning to, although I'm not sure I recall the confrontation you're referring to.
I haven’t been able to follow all the conversations closely this week due to holiday travels.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Dec 30, 2011 4:18 PM EST up reply actions
No Worries
No need to follow our nonsense. Enjoy your holiday travels and thanks for working on the blog during this time.
by wilmywoodcock on Dec 31, 2011 8:39 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks
I think I won’t try to make a point to UGA fans again. Again when they start throwing around names and stuff guess I just kinda got a little mad but that being said I didn’t mean to offend any UGA Fans so again I’m Sorry if I did. I’ll just stay right here and post to Gamecock fans.
by pchappel on Dec 31, 2011 7:10 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
I really wouldn't worry about it.
Dawg Sports is a great place, but it’s a bit incestuous, and it seems that opposing views are typically shut down pretty quickly. Take that for what it’s worth.
Plus, you can always confront UGA fans here at GABA, as long as you do so respectfully.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Dec 31, 2011 11:56 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks Gamecock Man
Will Always do it respectively have a great and wonderful New Year to you and yours and all of Gamecock Nation.
by pchappel on Dec 31, 2011 10:05 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions

by 













