Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why We're Skeptical Of LeBron James

South Carolina Gamecocks Post-Spring Depth Chart Relieased: Quick Thoughts

The football program released its post-spring depth chart earlier this afternoon. There were few huge surprises, but one thing really stood out: the roster lists Stephen Garcia and Connor Shaw as co-starters. If you still had any questions regarding whether or not Garcia will be back on the field this fall, here is your answer, what I would take to be a fairly unequivocal vote of confidence in Garcia from the coaching staff. We'll perhaps never know whether that vote of confidence means that the coaches feel that Garcia deserves another chance or that the coaching staff feels it can't win with Shaw as the starter, but the fact is that we should expect to see Garcia again.

There are a few other points to note from the new depth chart:

  • DeAngelo Smith has moved ahead of Lamar Scruggs on the depth chart. D.L. Moore still has his starting spot, but if spring was any indication, Smith will be aiming for Moore's spot next.
  • Dalton Wilson is listed as the starting fullback. I didn't get much of  a feel for him during the spring, and I'm unsure whether or not he's going to see a lot of playing time. It wouldn't surprise me if we see a lot of formations that don't use a fullback or if we use starting TE Justice Cunningham in an h-back role in some formations. I'm assuming the coaches are planning on primarily using Wilson in the I-formation, though.
  • D.J. Swearinger, Ace Sanders, and Kenny Miles are listed as kick returners. No more Bryce Sherman? Sorry, little fella, but I can't say I'm disappointed. Stephon Gilmore is back at punt returner over Sanders, which is fine by me as long as the coaches feel this won't affect Gilmore's play on defense.
  • The starting lineup at safety and spur is a little bit of a surprise, which may foretell future shuffling. Jimmy Legree is listed as the starter at free safety, D.J. Swearinger at strong safety, and Antonio Allen and DeVonte Holloman are listed as co-starters at spur. I was expecting Swearinger at FS, Holloman at SS, and Allen at spur, with Holloman expected to play spur at times and Legree expected to rotate onto the field more often. Whatever the case ends up being, it appears that the coaching staff is sold on the idea that Legree is ready for a more prominent role, which is a good thing, as we desperately need increased depth at safety.
  • Aldrick Fordham is listed as a starter at DT. It will be interesting to see how long he holds onto that spot with Kelcy Quarles and Phillip Dukes at his heels.

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Looks like Legree and Smith are reaping the rewards of their spring game

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Champagne for my real friends and real pain for my sham friends." - Tom Waits

by Gamecock'n'Balls on Apr 25, 2011 7:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah. Other than the Garcia news...

Smith and Legree look to be the main headliners from this year’s spring.

If the progress that Legree appears to have made is legit, then that’s great, great news for the program. We really need additional depth at safety.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Apr 25, 2011 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didn't notice Holloman was playing spur 'til Ellis Johnson mentioned it in an interview during the spring game.

He said that’s his more natural position, and he seemed to do way better there, so I’m cool with it. I’d be shocked if he beats out Allen for the starting role though.

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Apr 25, 2011 9:39 PM EDT reply actions  

There are many surprises to me on offense.

Not only did Moore beat out Smith for the number two spot, Smith isn’t even in the slot. Also, how did Barnes beat Sanders out for the slot?

I like the offensive line a lot better now. Watkins moving to right tackle will provide a huge run blocking force over there for Lattimore.

I like Simmons backing up Cunningham at tight end. Simmons’ big body there shows we’re committed to pounding defenses in the running game.

Strickland isn’t in the four deep at quarterback? Really? Ok then.

The smallest fullback on the team gets the start. Super. I hope they just use a tight end as a fullback in the I-form.

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Apr 25, 2011 10:04 PM EDT reply actions  

On defense ...

… I still don’t see what the fascination is with Fordham at tackle. He weighs 273 pounds. I suppose he has time to gain weight, but what could he have done thus far to warrant a starting role at that size? How bad are our mid-offensive linemen? I thought they were pretty good. I don’t understand what is going on there.

I don’t know how I feel about Ingram at end either. I’m willing to reserve judgment ’til I see him play a full game there though.

Damario Jeffery isn’t on the four deep at spur. He’s an outside linebacker now.

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Apr 25, 2011 10:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Ingram...

The DE end spot opposite of Taylor is likely reserved for Clowney. I would expect Ingram will then be available at tackle…meaning that it’s all the more likely that Fordham will not be the starter at that position.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Apr 25, 2011 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, Ingram is even smaller, but ok.

I don’t know, maybe 270 pound starting tackles are the thing these days. Let’s start a fad. It may work out fine. What do I know? I’d just hate to see our rush defense regress after their stellar prior season. I wanted big bodies to clog the middle, so I knew that aspect of our game was in good hands. Now, I’m concerned we may be sacrificing rush defense for pass rush ‘cause Ellis Johnson believes our secondary trouble last season was due in part to a lack of a pass rush at times. I’m not making that up. That’s what he said during the spring game. I don’t think that was the trouble hardly ever, but like I said what do I know?

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Apr 25, 2011 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

These things aren't decided on paper

I’ll trust the coaches who’ve spent every day for the past X amount of weeks with these guys.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Champagne for my real friends and real pain for my sham friends." - Tom Waits

by Gamecock'n'Balls on Apr 26, 2011 7:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Coaches get things wrong at a higher rate than would make me feel comfortable about this decision.

I’m not an old Carolina fan, but I remember a few years ago when we had the worst rush defense in the conference. What if it doesn’t work out, and they don’t realize it ’til after the Georgia game? That could be our whole season down the toilet. Whatever though.

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Apr 26, 2011 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Georgia game

If past history is any indicator, that tends to be the one game that you guys are never under-prepared for. I know you’ve got East Carolina to open, but I’ve got to believe that’s a five day preparation whereas Georgia is an entire off-season. At least it always feels like we get you guys’ best shot.

http://hobnailboot.wordpress.com/

by AuditDawg on Apr 26, 2011 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would imagine that Spurrier will only give a week's attention to East Carolina.

ECU is a decent team, but if we have no business losing to them if this Carolina team is anywhere near as good as last year’s team was. So. Miss. certainly didn’t pose much of a problem last year. Georgia, on the other hand, is possibly the most important game of the season, definitely one of the two or three most important. Spurrier will gameplan for it all off-season. Don’t forget that he not only has the SEC East and his hatred for Georgia to motivate him; he now seems to have a minor coaching rivalry with Todd Grantham. Spurrier has never been one to deny himself indulgence in personal animosities.

As far as Ingram goes, I expect he’ll largely play the same role as he did last year (DT on passing downs), with more time as a backup at DE and some time on run downs at DT. I’ll admit that I somewhat agree with silverblade and am a little worried that we don’t have as much beef on the defensive line as we did last year. However, Dukes is on his way in, and we have Jerideau, too. I trust the coaches to find something that works. If our run defense suffers a little bit, it will be OK as long as the secondary improves and the run defense doesn’t suffer TOO much.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Apr 26, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like

Holloman and Allen at spur. Guys that have experience in the secondary generally can read pass plays a bit better than your prototypical college LB. I can’t wait until fall and we get some of those freshman in that may get some starting time.

by stapleears on Apr 26, 2011 10:03 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about South Carolina Gamecocks.

Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Uscgamecocks_small Gamecock Man

Authors

Sir_big_spur_small The Feathered Warrior

Images_small GwinnettGamecock

South_carolina_gamecocks_4_small skandrewj62j

Ape-rogers-g-sc-8x10_small tryptic67

Roflbot_small Connor Tapp

Dscn2426_small Gamecock'n'Balls