Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Events Cause Mariners To Lose To Rangers

Profiles in Boldness: Ray Tanner and Scott Wingo's Rise from Unheralded Prospect to College World Series MVP

Let's revisit dictionary.com's definition of "bold":

bold

–adjective, -er, -est.

1.
not hesitating or fearful in the face of actual or possible danger or rebuff; courageous and daring: a bold hero.
2.
not hesitating to break the rules of propriety; forward; impudent: He apologized for being so bold as to speak to the emperor.
3.
necessitating courage and daring; challenging: a bold adventure.


2.  modest.


1.  fearless, adventurous, brave, valiant, intrepid, valorous, dauntless. 2. Bold, brazen, forward, presumptuous  may refer to manners in a derogatory way. Bold  suggests impudence, shamelessness, and immodesty: a bold stare. Brazen  suggests the same, together with a defiant manner: a brazen liar. Forward  implies making oneself unduly prominent or bringing oneself to notice with too much assurance. Presumptuous  implies overconfidence, effrontery, taking too much for granted.

bolder, boulder.

EXPAND

o·ver·bold·ness, noun
o·ver·bold·ly, adverb
o·ver·bold, adjective
bold·ness, noun
bold·ly, adverb


Origin:
before 1000; Middle English bald, bold, Old English b ( e ) ald;  cognate with Old Saxon, Old High German bald, Dutch boud  bold, Old Norse ballr  dire < Germanic *bál-tha-z;  akin to Welsh balch  proud, Irish balc  strong < *bal-ko-

Yesterday, I discussed Christian Walker's bold play for South Carolina in the College World Series; today, we're talking about Ray Tanner and Scott Wingo.

One of my favorite stories about this Gamecocks team is the story of how Scott Wingo made it to Carolina in the first place. As most of you probably know, Wingo is the son of Clemson legend Billy Wingo, who is one of Clemson's all-time greats on the baseball diamond and was also a standout at cornerback on the Tigers football team. You would think Scott would be playing for CU now, right? Well, if he had had his choice, that's probably what would have happened. However, Clemson coach Jack Leggett, otherwhise known as that guy who whined about heated bats when he suffered yet another humiliating loss to South Carolina, didn't think Scott was good enough to play for the Tigers, and he refused to offer him a scholarship. The rest, of course, is history. Ray Tanner decided to take a chance on the unheralded player, and since then Scott has become a Gamecocks legend and a household name in sports.

Keep reading after the jump.

Star-divide

I bring this story up not so much to rag on Clemmy, although I'm certainly happy to take a chance to do that, but more so to point to a key quality in Tanner's success these past two years: boldness. The truth is, you can't really blame Leggett for not signing Wingo. Wingo was undrafted out of high school and was not expected to do big things in major college baseball. Wingo was a kid that other major programs, including Clemson, weren't willing to take a chance on. However, Tanner saw something he liked in Wingo, and the gamble he then took has paid huge dividends for Carolina baseball. Wingo has gotten markedly better with each passing year, and now he's just won a CWS MVP Award after a post-season filled with jawdropping clutch plays both on defense and offense. To top it all off, Wingo was drafted in the 11th round by the Dodgers, something most folks never expected to happen. (Maybe not a blessing considering the current situation in L.A., but I digress.) Scott Wingo, in short, is a true inspiration, and it was Tanner's willingness to take a calculated risk that gave Wingo the opportunity to do the things he's done.

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Wingo

At first last year, I didn’t think Wingo was that good. Well boy was I wrong. He went from scoring the winning run in last years championship, to basically leading us to a repeat championship. He went from basically zero to Hero and a Legend. Not only is his defense good enough to make a brick wall look bad, his bat helped us win. If you havn’t already, check out “Wingo and his Yard Cocks” on youtube by Patrick Davis. This dude also wrote the song “Just a Big ’Ol Cock,” so if you havn’t seen that, look at it too.

To be the man, you've gotta beat the man. If you think you can beat the man, you gone get got!

by Cocky1366 on Jun 30, 2011 4:33 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Scott Wingo's recruitment

There is a lot of conflicting information out there about Scott Wingo and whether Jack Leggett extended an offer. Most Carolina fans say the Tigers didn’t. Most Clemson fans say they did – but they will concede Ray Tanner and the Gamecocks out-recruited Clemson for Scott’s services.

The 247 page for Scott Wingo shows Wingo holding offers from both schools Morever, after the 2010 CWS, Wingo talked about his recruiting:

"A reporter asked me after the final game, ‘How does it feel to have been rejected by Clemson?’ I felt like stopping him right there," Wingo relayed. "I wasn’t rejected by them. I wanted to go here. (Coach) Tanner made me an offer, and (Coach) Leggett made me one about a week and a half later. I just felt more comfortable here." When asked what made him more comfortable at South Carolina, Wingo responded, "The coaching staff. (Former USC assistant coach Jim) Toman was a big influence. When I came here, he did everything right." (emphasis added)

From what I can piece together, it seems that Scott was not considered a top prospect through his senior year at Mauldin H.S., and was committed to USC Upstate where his older brother played. He was by all accounts scrawny and had never been in a serious lifting program. Nevertheless, he had a break-out performance that summer after graduation (2007), and attracted the attention of former USC assistant Jim Toman. The otherwise excerable Ron Morris actually wrote a decent article on Wingo that goes into more detail about his recruiting by Coach Toman (who is now at Liberty).

That same summer, Coach Leggett already had gotten Mike Freeman to transfer to Clemson from UGA. You may recall that Freeman was a very, very solid player for CU (batted .332 and .328 in his two seasons with the Tigers, with an OBP over .400 both years). Freeman was a smart kid (2 time All ACC Academic) a leader (team captain) and drafted (36th round) who already had played a year in the SEC on a very good UGA squad.

If you read between the lines, it looks like Clemson already had what they considered their 2B of the future, while Wingo probably looked like more of a developmental project. But when Scott was offered by Carolina, I think Jack Leggett gave him an offer too – out of respect for Billy Wingo likely more than anythng. Wingo likely would not have started at Clemson since Freeman had the better bat in 08 and 09 (and that is no slur on Wingo – he was more valuable for his defense than his bat during his first years at Carolina, but Coach Tanner was constantly challenging Wingo to improve his average – some of his struggles are reported here ).

Well, as they say the rest is history. And kudos to Billy Wingo for wearing garnet and black to support his son even if he does still accidentally clap when he hears the Tiger Rag!

PS – Observe the coaching style of Ray Tanner in the last link – how he nurtured and challenged a talented but unheralded Gamecock who was not peforming to his full potential as an underclassman; rather than forcing him out (precious as baseball scholarships are), Tanner and the Gamecocks reaped the dividends during the young man’s senior year on the sport’s biggest stage.

They wore garnet helmets.

by tryptic67 on Jul 2, 2011 9:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Huh. Well, I stand corrected. Good thing someone here knows what he's talking about!

I think our conclusions are essentially the same, though. My purpose wasn’t so much to slam Leggett and CU—they had Freeman, and how could they have known Scott would be this good?—as much as it was to applaud Tanner and Scott for all they’ve achieved together. I think you really hit the nail on the head right here:

PS – Observe the coaching style of Ray Tanner in the last link – how he nurtured and challenged a talented but unheralded Gamecock who was not peforming to his full potential as an underclassman; rather than forcing him out (precious as baseball scholarships are), Tanner and the Gamecocks reaped the dividends during the young man’s senior year on the sport’s biggest stage.

BTW, I can think of a Carolina coach in another sport who could learn a thing or two from this point.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Jul 2, 2011 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

We did reach the same conclusion on Wingo ...

which I would have said … except that I saw you had included an after-the-jump-paragraph (saying everything I had just said) only after I hit “post”!

The only reason I bothered looking up the issue of Wingo’s CU offer was because one of my best friends is a huge Clemson guy who yesterday was tut-tutting Carolina fans for saying Clemson had refused to offer Wingo. So mostly I was fact-checking my friend for my own edification – though anyone could be forgiven for thinking otherwise as it has become accepted wisdom on Gamecock Central and The Big Spur.

You figured out who I was talking about in the last paragraph? Heh. We only have two upperclassmen playing hoops for USC next year – one senior, and one junior. Contrast that to the bevy of seniors (Wingo, Morales, Taylor, etc.) who played baseball for USC. I don’t know how to run a basketball team, or skipper a baseball squad for that matter, but I do know good people management when I see it. Tanner has it.

I have a sinking suspicion that if Ramon Galloway had been the same type of baseball player that he was a hoopster, then he’d still be wearing the garnet and black; I have a further sinking suspicion that Wingo’s basketball-doppelganger would have been asked to leave Carolina.

They wore garnet helmets.

by tryptic67 on Jul 2, 2011 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know I'm in a minority here, and maybe this isn't kosher to bring up so close off the heels of baseball's latest big win...

But I want a competitive basketball program at Carolina so badly. I love college basketball and think we have all the institutional tools to be a major player in the SEC. The truth hurts, though:

I have a sinking suspicion that if Ramon Galloway had been the same type of baseball player that he was a hoopster, then he’d still be wearing the garnet and black; I have a further sinking suspicion that Wingo’s basketball-doppelganger would have been asked to leave Carolina.

Sadly, I think you’re right here. Heck, I don’t even think we’d have had Sam Muldrow as a senior if you-know-who had been Sam’s original coach.

I guess I’ll leave it at that, b/c I hate to be a Debbie Downer at a time like this. Let’s just say that Ray Tanner is a great coach and leave it at that.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Jul 2, 2011 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Alot of Carolina fans consider themselves mainly football fans,

But I would love to be competitive in football, basketball, and baseball all together. Someone said the other day, “man it’s just baseball, it’s not football,” and I said, “I don’t care if it’s Gamecock women’s soccer, if we’re playing for a championship, we’re playing for a championship.”

To be the man, you've gotta beat the man. If you think you can beat the man, you gone get got!

by Cocky1366 on Jul 2, 2011 8:29 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

For sure. A healthy overall athletics program is a good guarantor of longterm success in all your sports.

And that’s what we should strive for. Look at the programs that are consistently winning. Florida, Texas, Ohio St., etc. All programs that put an effort into having good overall athletics programs. We could have that. Baseball is already there. Football seems very close. Basketball and some of the other sports…not so much. But we can get there. And when we do, they’ll all feed off of each other to produce a healthier overall athletics program.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Jul 2, 2011 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're right that there is no reason we can't be good in men's hoops

but for some reason, we just haven’t been able to hit a stride.

There is plenty of talent in this state. We’re located close to enough to Atlanta, Charlotte and the big Florida metropolises to be able to recruit those areas.

We’re on the east coast which puts us in a good time zone for tv exposure. We have almost-new, high-end facilities.

I truly hope that Coach Horn can “turn it around” this year. I’m worried that with the graduation of Sam Muldrow, the unexpected defections of Bruce Ellington and Murphy Holloway, and the resignation/dismissal of Ramon Galloway that we’ll be forced to rely on (again) on talented but still physically immature and un-tested freshmen, with barely any physically mature, battle-tested veterans.

I don’t feel the least bit bad thinking of the state of Gamecocks hoops at this time of triumph in Gamecocks baseball. It shows we care. It is a cliche but its true that Gamecock fans are like a family. Just like Cocky1366 says, we want every team to win every time. True, football is King and Baseball is the Golden Child now. But, like a parent – like a family member – I want Basektball to reach its full potential.

They wore garnet helmets.

by tryptic67 on Jul 3, 2011 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about South Carolina Gamecocks.

Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Uscgamecocks_small Gamecock Man

Authors

Sir_big_spur_small The Feathered Warrior

Images_small GwinnettGamecock

South_carolina_gamecocks_4_small skandrewj62j

Ape-rogers-g-sc-8x10_small tryptic67

Roflbot_small Connor Tapp

Dscn2426_small Gamecock'n'Balls