Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Despite Relocation Drama, Coyotes Overcome Adversity

SEC Successfull Enacts Oversigning Legislation

As you've probably by now heard, the SEC Presidents voted to sign in wide-ranging new oversigning / roster management regulations. The new rules are as follows:

(1) Eliminated the one-year graduate student exception adopted just last year. A student-athlete who transfers in to have two years of eligibility remaining in order to participate in athletics. However, this won’t be implemented the 2012 season.

(2) Will not permit an SEC institution to sign a prospect to a financial aid agreement until that prospect is enrolled and is a full-time student attending classes. It applies to a prospect who intends to enroll prior to the projected high school graduation date (aka early enrollment).

(3) Established legislation specifying that the conference office will oversee the administration of medical scholarship exemptions. The SEC will have a role in reviewing and deciding the outcome of each medically-related exemption.

(4) Reduced the permissible number of signees from 28 to 25 and moves back the start date for the window for counting date back to Dec. 1. Allow signees to be exempt from the 25 limit if they can be counted as an initial counter in the current year. Establish an oversight process involving a review of roster management issues by the conference office and the presidents and by the ADs. It will require written reports from all 12 institutions.In addition going to propose this legislation nationally. Will write to Dr. Emmert in the next few weeks to advise him that the conference has submitted this proposal we have adopted and we have an expectation that the NCAA should and will adopt the same proposal. It’s in the best interest of prospects, not only here but in the nation.

(5) A prospective student-athlete who attends summer school will count against that year’s scholarship total.

There are several things to observe about the new regulations. The first is that this doesn't stop oversigning. The regulations don't install a hard cap prohibiting coaches from signing above the 85-player total limit, meaning that coaches like Bobby Petrino and Nick Saban are still free to sign tons of players and then to cut players who aren't performing to standard to make room for the new guys. The new rules do limit coaches' ability to sign over 85, but they don't eliminate it.

Frankly, a hard cap of 85 total players wouldn't solve this problem, either. Even with a hard cap, coaches would still be able to can underperforming players. They'd just have to do so before recruiting season begins, in order to make more room under the 85-player cap. The only thing that would really change things on this note is  to make scholarships a four-year commitment from the school. That was never on the table in the first place, and considering that enacting a rule like that would put the SEC at a serious disadvantage vis-a-vis other schools, don't expect it to ever happen unless the NCAA institutes it across the board.

The second thing to observe, though, is that these new rules arent' simply window dressing, despite what many are saying. The medical-hardship rule could have a major effect at Alabama, where it appears that Nick Saban and his staff have vastly exploited medical hardships for purposes of roster purging. The financial-aid agreement rule should do a lot to protect student-athletes and help them keep their options open during recruitment. The 25-player limit will force coaches to do business more wisely than in the past.

There's still work to be done on this issue. I suspect we're going to find that enterprising coaches will still find ways to exploit the rules. However, we're being unjust if we don't acknowledge that the SEC took a big step today. Lots of SEC critics thought nothing would come out of this meeting on the oversigning front. Now, they want to have it both ways and say that what did happen--and Slive nearly got his entire leaked proposal pushed through--doesn't matter. They're wrong. This is definitely progress, and the SEC should be commended for what it did this week.

So, what do you think of the new rules?

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

So...

It seems like the end result is fewer scholarships offered, particularly to kids with uncertain academic statuses.

Obviously, academics are something that the student-athletes have control over to a point, but I don’t see the value in enacting policies that diminish their chances of playing in the SEC. Some students who qualify at the last minute turn out to be pretty good people.

by Connor Tapp on Jun 4, 2011 1:48 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm not so sure that I'm as worried about this negatively impacting academically marginal students as I once was.

Students with questionable academics will still have prep school and junior college open to them. Coaches can still sign a kid, send him to prep school, and then bring him on the roster in a future year and count him retroactively against the year when he originally signed. That gives coaches some wiggling room when it comes to prep school kids. Coaches can also get in contact with a more marginal kid, see him go off to junior college, and then hope they have a good shot at the kid if he makes the grade in junior college a couple of years down the road. In sum, while coaches may have to change the way they do things to a certain degree, they’re still going to have options at their disposal for helping kids who are marginal academically to get on their roster at some point. This is particularly true of the kids who are truly talented football players. Coaches may now be a bit less likely to take a chance on a kid who has bad grades and is only an average player, but they’re still going to be willing to take risks to get the really great players.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Jun 4, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Notice the one year post-grad restriction doesn't apply until 2012

giving Auburn a shot to bring in Russell Wilson for 2011. If the rule is a good rule , then it should come into effect now.

I swear, if the SEC didn’t have double-standards where Auburn is concerned, it wouldnt have any standards at all. Someone must have pictures of Mike Slive. I think it is long past-due time to move the SEC offices out of the Yellowhammer State. Nashville would be preferable and more geographically central to the league. At least I could have some sense that the ‘Dores wouldn’t dominate the league the way I fear Auburn and Bama do.

They wore garnet helmets.

by tryptic67 on Jun 5, 2011 10:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Well stated

As we discussed here, these rules aren’t going to stop Bobby Petrino from granting players their releases.

However I do agree that this was a positive step, particularly the league oversight of medical hardships. If nothing else, there is now an independent verification system in place that will validate the hardships that did not exist before and will cut down on any monkey business from coaches exploiting this practice cough icknay abansay cough.

I do agree a bit with the Oversigning.com crowd (I know, don’t judge me) that this doesn’t go far enough. As I stated above, these restrictions do not stop coaches from actively managing their rosters to the detriment of kids. Nor does a hard 85 cap (as the Oversigning.com crowd would have you believe). The only thing that is going to stop coaches from exploiting kids through loopholes is to close them through some combination of the following:

-Make scholarships 4 year binding agreements (good luck with this one)
-Allow players to transfer without one year penalty (ditto the above comment)
-Require coaches to submit an 85 man roster in March that includes the current signing class (you may fall below the 85 limit due to natural attrition, but there are no games that can be played here by coaches)

Frankly, I don’t see any of those happening. I think the biggest impact from this new legislation is that coaches are going to be a little more selective when it comes to academically at-risk kids as they can’t afford to lose on of the 25 slots to a player that has less than 50% chance of getting on campus. As you stated above, this won’t really impact the great players, but a lot of average players will likely be going the prep school/JUCO route than in the past.

http://hobnailboot.wordpress.com/

by AuditDawg on Jun 6, 2011 5:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Great post. I agree that the legislation doesn't go far enough...

But the level of the rhetoric at oversigning.com is completely out of whack with the situation. The new legislation does represent legitimate incremental change, and those guys won’t even admit that. I feel that their site is mostly dedicated to puffing the Big 10, and this really shows it. They wouldn’t admit the SEC did something right if it was completely obvious to everyone else. Their senseless puffing of the 85 limit, which, as you say, wouldn’t really stop Petrino et al., says all you really need to know. That site is dedicated to B10 = good, SEC = bad, end of story.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Jun 6, 2011 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about South Carolina Gamecocks.

Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Uscgamecocks_small Gamecock Man

Authors

Sir_big_spur_small The Feathered Warrior

Images_small GwinnettGamecock

South_carolina_gamecocks_4_small skandrewj62j

Ape-rogers-g-sc-8x10_small tryptic67

Roflbot_small Connor Tapp

Dscn2426_small Gamecock'n'Balls