Vanderbilt at South Carolina Preview: Matchups between Vanderbilt's Offense and South Carolina's Defense
This post continues our series previewing the Vandy game. Yesterday, we looked at Vandy's defense. Today, we're looking at their offense. I apologize for not having time to put up a proper post today, which has, yet again, been quite busy.
Based on comments from the post-practice press conferences, It sounds like the USC corners may be going to play more aggressive, man-to-man coverages. All I have to say is that it's about time. Our defensive backs seem to have a constitutional aversion to good decision-making and effective assignment maintenance in our various cover schemes. Moreover, it can't be lost upon Vandy that we seem so content to give opponents the short-field pass, as Vandy doesn't have a great quarterback or talented receivers and would thus prefer to dink and dunk us rather than take risky shots down field. Going to man coverage is a great move here, particularly considering that our defensive backs have Vandy's receivers beaten in the athleticism department. If Stephon Gilmore, Victor Hampton, and C.C. Whitlock can't run with this group of receivers, something is wrong. The good news is that they can, and I hope to see us line our corners up in man coverage at the line of scrimmage in all but third-and-long situations this week. We've got the athletes; we should scheme like it.
The Vandy passing-game renaissance is still in the making. With Vandy having struggled to pass the ball well ever since the departure of Jay Cutler and Earl Bennett, one of the things that James Franklin promised Vandy fans is an improved aerial attack. Franklin is known as an effective QBs and WRs coach and for having put together some pretty solid offenses under Ralph Friedgen at Maryland. However, success in this department has yet to come at Vandy. 'Dores QB Larry Smith remains inconsistent, and Vandy lacks effective playmakers at WR. To make matters worse, the 'Dores offensive line, despite being fairly experienced, has been highly ineffective thus far, having allowed Smith to be sacked nine times. Quite frankly, I would like to see the Gamecocks be as aggressive as possible in attacking Smith in this game. I like our chances of forcing him to make mistakes.
Expect Vandy to run the ball. The 'Dores are currently running a fair bit more than they are passing. They struggled to do either a couple of weeks ago against UConn, and while they were somewhat more effective running last week against Ole Miss, if you go back and watch the game, you'll see that most of their best runs came on gadget plays (look out for the Statue of Liberty handoff) and after almost absurd Ole Miss defensive miscues. With the way Vandy's offensive line is performing right now, we should be able to hold Vandy's running game in check if we come to play.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Who said that we'll be playing more aggressive, man-to-man coverages?
Definitely agree with all of the above and hope we do start properly utilizing our DB talent.
Spurrier said something about it in his press conference.
I should note that what I really want to to see is more press man coverage. We’ve been playing our corners in man much of this season, but they’ve been playing way off the line of scrimmage. This seems to me like something you want to do when only when you don’t have the athletes at corner to hang with opposing WRs, and that’s usually not going to be a problem for us. As far as the safeties go, I can again understand the use for zone in some cases, but—and this goes for the point in general—the main reason you use zone is to cover downfield, and when you have a pass rush that’s as good as ours, opposing QBs—as we saw against Georgia—aren’t going to have time to allow plays to develop downfield. They’re going to be trying to get the ball out quickly. In that case, I say you go to press man, defend the underneath and midfield stuff, and rely on your pass rush to stop the downfield passing game. Maybe you get beat once or twice per game, but you also make lots of big plays and keep the opponent from slowly bleeding you to death.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 22, 2011 5:54 AM EDT up reply actions
The other thing to note is that moving to man requires the front eight to do more in run support...
So again, I think the zone can be very useful situationally—we’ll probably need it to slow down Auburn. But against Vandy I say we scheme more aggressively.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 22, 2011 5:57 AM EDT up reply actions
The danger with man
is that if the safeties are out of position, you can give up the big play. Spurrier’s been chiding Ellis Johnson’s unit for being out of position. So I guess we’ll have to see if it works better or not.
Here's a health, Carolina, forever to thee! UNIVERSITAS CAROLIN MERID. 1801 Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros (Ovid)
Of course ...
safety positioning is critical in zone coverages too!
Here's a health, Carolina, forever to thee! UNIVERSITAS CAROLIN MERID. 1801 Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros (Ovid)
Yeah, they're out of position in zone coverage, too.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 22, 2011 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions
" take risky shorts down field"
Is this a euphemism for something?
Heh. Supposed to be "shots."
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 22, 2011 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Where does Vic Hampton look to figure on the depth chart?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
by Gamecock'n'Balls on Sep 22, 2011 10:36 AM EDT reply actions
That's a good question. The depth chart places him behind Gilmore, with Whitlock or Markett starting opposite. I would have thought, though, that Hampton would be given the chance to spell and fight for playing time opposite Gilmore.
I’m not sure if he knows both corner positions as well as each other, though.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 22, 2011 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Regardless, the coaches have said he'll be playing a lot. And he's supposedly at his best in press man coverage. Very athletic.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 22, 2011 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
You also have to concede
that his personality is also probably (likely) very well-suited to play CB.
Here's a health, Carolina, forever to thee! UNIVERSITAS CAROLIN MERID. 1801 Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros (Ovid)
So, what's his back story?
Troubled but highly rated recruit, we took him because Florida wouldn’t? Something along those lines, perhaps? Educate me!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
by Gamecock'n'Balls on Sep 22, 2011 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions
More along the lines of being
a temperamental, prima donna-type. In the best sense, of course!
We don’t have to love ’em in order to love ’em. If that makes any sense!
Here's a health, Carolina, forever to thee! UNIVERSITAS CAROLIN MERID. 1801 Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros (Ovid)
Based on what EJ said post-practice, sounds like Vic is only capable of playing Gilmore's position, but Gilmore can move over if need be.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 22, 2011 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Maybe that would be best
I still get the feeling that Stephon is over-thinking . I don’t mean that in a negative or insulting way – he is obviously a smart kid and he should play smart too. What I mean is that instinct is a huge element in CB play. He had “it” his freshman year.
Here's a health, Carolina, forever to thee! UNIVERSITAS CAROLIN MERID. 1801 Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros (Ovid)

by 














