Gamecocks Golden Age Mt. Rushmore: The Results

You voted on the best players from the past four seasons. We Photoshopped their faces on a mountainside.

Last week, we announced a reader-driven contest that asked: What four players best embody South Carolina's recent run of success, such that you'd be comfortable chiseling them into the program's own version of Mt. Rushmore? The voting extended to any rostered players from the past 14 seasons.  The survey received 1,420 total votes—actually closer to 1,450 but hell if I'm paying $25 to Survey Monkey so I can see those 30 votes that exceeded the free minimum. They wouldn't have made a difference anyway, since the top four vote-getters distanced themselves from the pack.

Without further ado, your leading vote-getter and the first mug on USC's Golden Age Mt. Rushmore: Marcus Lattimore, chosen by 92 percent of voters.

Gabarushmorelat_medium

That Lat led the way is unsurprising; that he wasn't unanimous is the real headscratcher. I'll assume some user error played into that, since it seems not everyone voted for four players. And maybe some of you felt a guy who set the school touchdown record despite only playing the equivalent of two full seasons and suffered an unspeakable amount of pain whilst donning your colors and yet remains one of the best ambassadors in program history simply wasn't worthy of your praise, you jerk. Also, Abe Lincoln's hair on Marcus Lattimore makes him look a little like Little Richard. He looks about as happy about it as you'd expect. Asked about which part of the sculpture was his favorite, Lattimore responded, "Jaw, definitely."

We soldier ahead to your #2 vote-getter. Appearing on 90 percent of all ballots, it's Connor Shaw.

Gabarushmoreshaw_medium

Again, somewhat surprising that Shaw wasn't unanimous, but maybe there still exist some vestiges of the "Bench Connor for Dylan" movement that was robust this time last year operating out of backwoods headquarters scattered throughout South Carolina. Hey, I'm glad no one listened to those people.

In third place, appearing on 83% of all ballots, we have Jadeveon Clowney:

Gabarushmoreclowney_medium

Inarguably the most high-profile of any Gamecock in the past four years and maybe ever, Clowney receive a lot of votes for someone who hates football. BUT SRSLY as with the other two, addressing the "why not?" is a more stimulating endeavor. Perhaps some folks opted for a four year guy like Melvin Ingram over Clowney. Perhaps there was a bias towards offensive players. Perhaps Merril Hoge voted. Who knows. But despite Clowney finishing in third place, he was in no real danger of losing his place on the mountain.

Nor was the fourth place vote-getter, who finished well ahead of the next closest candidate. Appearing on roughly 65% of all ballots, the fourth and final visage on the Gamecock Golden Age Mt. Rushmore is: Alshon Jeffery.

Gabarushmorealshon_medium

Again, it wasn't close. I was a bit surprised by the lack of competition for the fourth spot. I think Alshon's highlight-heavy 2013 season with the Bears is at least partially to thank for the distance between fourth and fifth place. If he was buried on a scout team, I bet Melvin Ingram, Stephon Gilmore, or even Bruce Ellington could have made it interesting. But with the emergence of Alshon Jeffery: NFL Star, we're still privy to the heroics that cemented his legend during his time in Columbia.

A few superlatives.

1. Best Write-Ins

We did receive 14 "other" votes, and here were some of the best write-in candidates:

  • "George Rogers": Four votes for Big George, in fact. All-time USC Mt. Rushmore? Absolutely. But this was exclusive to players from the 2010-2014 seasons. Follow directions, people!
  • "Spurrier deserves a spot. He's given himself a game ball before." I can't argue with this.
  • "Steve Spuriur" [sic]
  • "Chaun Gresham." He'd appear on the Mt. Rushmore of Chaun Greshams, probably.
  • "Skai Moore": I like it! It's not just a vote for a freshman all-conference player, it's a vote for the future.
2. Runner Ups

Yeah, I know it's Runners Up, but there's a great Kurt Vile song called "Runner Ups" and I wanted to link it, so, nyeh.

Anyway, here's how the rest of the top ten shook out. Parenthetical number is the percentage of ballots on which candidate appeared.

5. Stephon Gilmore (18%)

6. Melvin Ingram (16%)

7. DJ Swearinger (14%)

8. Bruce Ellington (6%)

9. Stephen Garcia (3%)

10. TJ Johnson (2%)

3. Biggest Surprise

Mike Davis received just four measly votes. I thought recency would work to his benefit, and Chicken Hoops pointed out just how good Davis has been in his two years at South Carolina. Would another thousand yard season be enough for Mike Davis to displace Alshon Jeffery? Hopefully we'll find out!

Total Results

In case you're interested:

Screen_shot_2014-05-01_at_11.37.24_am_medium

Anything jump out to you? Aside from the fact that there are delightfully few losses to Clemson in this list's collective resume?

A sincere thanks to all you readers who participated with such gusto. We'll try to get this thing on the docket at the next BOA meeting. Let's get this thing built into the side of...uh...wait, where the hell's this thing gonna go?

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Garnet And Black Attack

You must be a member of Garnet And Black Attack to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Garnet And Black Attack. You should read them.

Join Garnet And Black Attack

You must be a member of Garnet And Black Attack to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Garnet And Black Attack. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker