South Carolina at Ohio State: A Quick Recap
My apologies for not being around to preview this game. As I said, I'm traveling for the holidays, and I just never got a chance to get up a post about it.
And maybe that was for the best. While I could have written about my hopes that we might put up a fight against the second-ranked Buckeyes, what happened was what was to be expected: we got manhandled by a superior team, 79-57. Unlike the Michigan St. game, this one was never really close, with Ohio St. building a sizeable lead by the mid-point in the first half and never looking back. Jared Sullinger lead the way for OSU with 30 points, while Sam Muldrow lead Carolina with 14.
A few quick thoughts on the game. I note that I didn't watch the game, so these are based mainly on reading on the box score and watching some highlights.
- Scanning the box score, two individual lines jump out at you: Sullinger scored 30 points on 10-17 FG shooting and a solid night at the FT line, while Bruce Ellington scored six points on 3-15 FG shooting and 0-5 from beyond the arc. OSU's star stepped up for the Bucks and delivered a huge game, while Ellington had a bad night in front of the hostile Columbus crowd. We needed our star to get hot to keep this game close. It didn't happen. Ellington will learn from it, though, and have tougher nerves next time.
- Sullinger's dominance deserves a couple more comments. I had hoped that the Wofford performance indicated that we were ready to step it up a bit on the front line, but that's apparently not the case, or least not against elite competition. Sullinger dominated us, and other than Muldrow, none of our big men returned the favor. Developing the guys we have and / or recruiting a top-flight big man needs to be priority numero uno for Horn.
That's a wrap on this one. Next up is Furman.
Tweet
4 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
That Sullinger dude also got more rebounds than any Ohio State player has in a single game since the '60s.
That was quite possibly the worst rebounding game ever. No one could shoot, and there were way too many turnovers. The passing was not good. I felt bad for Ellington out there. He looked like he should’ve still been in high school in that game, or the other team’s players should’ve been in the NBA. It just looked awful from tip to buzzer.
I don’t think it was much different from the Michigan State game. We were never really in that one either. Michigan State just kept passing the ball out of bounds, or dribbling it off their own feet when they got a big lead. Then, Carolina would start to make it competitive, Michigan State would stop playing like five goofs, and they’d bump the score back up and out of range. We got dominated in both. Carolina is clearly not ready to even be competitive with the big boys. I’ll say, though, they’re doing a lot better than I thought they would post-Downey. I just wish they’d get a physical guy underneath, and fix the free throw shooting. Then, they’d at least be competitive against anyone.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Dec 18, 2025 8:21 PM EST reply actions
The difference between this and Michigan St., at least from what I can tell from reading the recap..
is that Ohio St. is better than Michigan St. They were able to do a better job of putting us away.
I think our problems mostly go back to lack of inside presence. We got manhandled by a star big man. We got raped on the boards. We only got to the line seven (!) times. You’ve gotta do better than that to compete with the big boys, and we’re not there yet, not by a long shot. Muldrow is a decent, if inconsistent player, and the rest of the guys are either ineffective or haven’t had time to put on weight yet.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Dec 18, 2025 8:38 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, they actually had two dudes who looked like they could take on Rambo in a fist fight.
Several times we had three guys around the basket to their one, and they’d still get the rebound. When Ohio State put two white guys on the court at the same time, I thought we had them, but they only seemed to get better.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Dec 18, 2025 8:46 PM EST up reply actions
Oh, one other thing I noticed was they really switched up the defense.
They only played aggressively once that I remember. Usually, they do it for about half the game. I’m not a big basketball fan. I don’t know all the strategy that’s involved, but it seems like it would be a good idea to go for turnovers when you’re that far behind. I dunno. Maybe someone else can school me as to what the reasoning was there.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Dec 18, 2025 8:34 PM EST reply actions

by Gamecock Man on 











