South Carolina CourtCocks Beat Clemson, Snap Series Losing Streak
South Carolina just put the finishing touches on a hard-fought, 64-60 victory over the Clemson Tigers in Colonial Life Arena. The victory snapped Clemson's six-game winning streak in the series. Bruce Ellington led Carolina with 14 points, including a key trey to put Carolina up by six in the final minute. Sam Muldrow, Brian Richardson, and Malik Cooke also scored in double figures in an evenly distributed offensive effort.
Carolina did some good and bad things in this game. First, the bad:
- When you're a team that emphasizes the press and offensive rebounding as much as us, you hate to see a -3 deficit in FGA. The culprit appears to be, like last year, poor rebounding. Clemson dominated us on the boards and had way too many put-backs. That's what kept them in a game where they otherwise looked outclassed. It goes to show you, though, how important rebounding is.
- We continue to have trouble from the line. We've had some games where we've shot FTs OK, but in most we're looking like we have the past few years, which is mediocre to bad. Some of the misses occurred late in the game, which contributed to what could have been a relatively comfortable win being a pretty close one.
Now, the good:
- This freshman class has some shooters! Ellington and Richardson both knocked down some nice shots. If Ramon Galloway could get his touch back, we could end up being one of the SEC's better three-point shooting teams.
- Other than on the boards, we're playing defense well. Muldrow continues to be a presence as a shot blocker, and we're forcing teams to take bad shots. Clemson shot less than 40%. I'll take that kind of performance from our defense any day of the week.
All in all, this was a good performance. Not great, but good and promising. I'm beginning to think that this team may be capable of putting together a halfway decent season. There's probably too much youth and too little inside presence to expect an NCAA berth, but I'm beginning to see the NIT as a possibility.
And oh yeah: Clemson, you got owned in 2010.
Tweet
7 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Congrats, Gamecocks.
Big win. Takes a bit of the bile out of the mouth lingering from yesterday.
I still can’;t believe we let them win six in a row, seeing as we had Devan Downey four of those years and Tre Kelley for two.
They wore garnet helmets.
by tryptic67 on Dec 5, 2025 7:49 PM EST reply actions
You're Right
But—we actually had Downey for only three of those-and Kelley for three of them (Downey was at Cincy his freshman year).
Having said that, yeah, I don’t get it either. I think it just happened to coincide with Purnell building their program and our changeover from Uncle Dave to Horn.
by theodometer on Dec 5, 2025 8:30 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks for the correction
O.P. was a good coach.
They wore garnet helmets.
by tryptic67 on Dec 5, 2025 9:42 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I think Clemson is going to miss him.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Dec 5, 2025 9:46 PM EST up reply actions
Blown layups
I was sure all those blown layups/dunks were going to end up biting us. Nice win by the cocks. If we can get our guys to bulk up a bit, we might be a team to watch. They all look like they are fresh out of high school.
by ssladler on Dec 5, 2025 7:50 PM EST reply actions
No kidding. We have no inside muscle.
Makes we wish Mike Holmes was still around. You need some guys like that.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog By and For Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Dec 5, 2025 9:47 PM EST up reply actions
Great game and great way to finish the weekend.
I actually thought our rebounding was great in the first half, but our overall hustle fell off quite a bit in the second half. We also had a problem with finishing at the rim, since we had several great looks and just couldn’t get the roll or the put-back. I mean, missing dunks? Come on now. However, it was nice to see us in the paint so much, since we’ve been abused by lesser teams than Clemson in that area.
I can’t say enough about Richardson — he’s got a great stroke and he wasn’t afraid to take to the rim, either. Jefferson has made the most of his minutes and his game looks leaps and bounds above where it was last year. Ellington, of course, was his usual self, but I think he needs to a) get better at the line and b) stop trying to force things so much. I appreciate his quickness and aggression on offense, but several times he tried to split a pack of defenders and then threw the ball away.
Aside from a couple ill-advised fouls, I thought we played some really aggressive D without getting into hot water. Clemson really shot themselves in the foot in that respect; they finished the game with the majority of their starting lineup in foul trouble. It’s good to see that we’ve found a bit of a balance defensively.
by RumblinFish on Dec 5, 2025 11:07 PM EST reply actions

by Gamecock Man on 











