Southern Miss. Golden Eagles at South Carolina Gamecocks Post-Game: Gauging the Importance of the Win
Hi, folks. Everyone around our program is feeling pretty good right now about the win. Why all of the excitement? The key is definitely how well the offense played last night. If memory serves, this was the first time we've hit 40 points since the Liberty Bowl in 2006. We've had some very average-to-bad offenses since then, and Gamecock Nation has been wondering if Steve Spurrier would ever produce another team that could live up to the pedigree Spurrier brought with him from his Fun-n-Gun days at Florida. It seems this may actually be the team. Granted, the outburst came against a Southern Miss. team that has fielded some notoriously swiss-cheese defenses under Larry Fedora, but I'll remind you that we haven't been able to run up the points like that against any opponent over the past few years, including FCS and Sun Belt cupcakes. Anytime you ring up totals like that, you're doing something right. What we saw last night isn't necessarily a good predictor of how well the offense will play against a Georgia or an Alabama, but it was indicative of progress.
There were a handful of takeways for our team that should be mentioned. They are as follows:
QB play was very solid from both Stephen Garcia and Connor Shaw. Both threw a couple of slightly bad passes--I'm thinking particularly of the one where Garcia didn't lead Alshon Jeffery quite enough on a long ball over the middle and the one where Shaw threw a ball behind Marcus Lattimore on a wheel route. Both should have been touchdowns, particularly the one by Shaw, which was a pretty easy pass on a play that opened up really well otherwise. But both also made some very good passes--Shaw's TD to D.L. Moore stands out, as does that bomb where Garcia hooked up with Jeffery while throwing out of the endzone. And both made good decisions, particularly Garcia. If you can believe it, Garcia was not sacked and threw no interceptions. I know; shocking.
One last thing here: I think that Shaw has earned the right to continue to get a little playing time, and I actually like the change of pace he brings--he seems to be a shiftier runner than Garcia, and that combined with not being a slouch throwing the ball means that continuing to play him will give opposing defenses an extra wrinkle to prepare for. But Garcia solidified his hold on the starting spot with his performance. He wasn't perfect, but he was good--probably the best we've seen out of a QB under Spurrier here.
Marcus Lattimore is going to be the starting runningback this year. Lattimore strikes me as a more effective version of Kenny Miles--he hits the hole hard, runs with authority, and, more so than Miles, he catches and blocks well. It was a real shame that Shaw underthrew that ball on the wheel route, because I think that would have been a good chance to see what Lattimore can do for us in the passing game. I also liked that he was able to get some yards even when the run blocking wasn't totally there, which was good considering our perpetual line woes.
Continue reading after the jump.
The offensive line looked OK to me. The run blocking was decent and they did a good job protecting the QB when USM didn't bring pressure. That's progress, I guess. However, they had trouble working with blitzes, and I would expect the confident DCs in the SEC to exploit that. I wouldn't call their performance indicative of a huge improvement over last season, but they were playing without Jarriel King, which should be taken into account.
The receivers looked solid. Alshon looked like Alshon, and I think it's time to recognize that we may have gotten a real steal with this Ace Sanders kid. One thing to note about the receivers is that there was a lot of contact going on between them and the DBs. It'll be interesting to see how the officials respond to that against UGA next week.
Spurrier appears to be opening up the playbook a bit this year. We saw a lot of different formations, from the power-running I to the spread. You have to think that Spurrier is trying to psyche out UGA and Todd Grantham here. It'll be interesting to see what the HBC brings out next week. One of his old tricks at Florida was to show a lot of different looks in the warm up games prior to Tennessee, only to try something completely different against the Vols. You have to think he's sandbagging that way again right now. One thing is for sure: Spurrier appears to have legitimate confidence that this offense can do a number of things for him. The weapons are finally in place, and this should be a fun season to watch, if nothing else.
The defense looked OK, but it was hard to get a good sense of what we're dealing with this year. Ellis Johnson didn't show many of his cards last night, and you have to think he'll be more aggressive next week against the Dawgs. I'm also curious to see what we do with A.J. Green. We clearly played to take DeAndre Brown out of the game last night, usually to good effect. You have to think that if we do that against Green, UGA will be able to do more to make us pay than USM did. But I would also think that Johnson knows that and will plan accordingly. Last night, he was aware that Brown was the potential gamechanger and that taking him out of the picture would cripple USM; he knows that won't be true against UGA, even if Green requires a gameplan unto himself. Lastly here, I really hope Shaw Wilson returns for UGA. We need him.
That's a wrap for this one. Enjoy the weekend of football. I would pay close attention to what Aaron Murray looks like.
Tweet
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Even Chris Low had some praise for us, which is incredibly rare.
Great game, fellas.
by VA Libertarian on Sep 3, 2025 1:36 PM EDT reply actions
The re-addition of Shaq Wilson will make me feel so much better about the UGA game.
Dum spiro spero - "While I breathe, I hope"
State motto of South Carolina
by The Feathered Warrior on Sep 3, 2025 1:55 PM EDT reply actions
We need his pass rushing abilities.
I should mention that I was not favorably impressed by our front four’s rush last night. I don’t think we recorded a sack, although there was that intentional grounding that was essentially a sack. The mitigating factor was that USM was usually only making three-step drops and was releasing the ball quickly. Their QB was a little shifty, too.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 3, 2025 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions
There was no explosion. They were just slow off the snap.
All of them need to down a few cups of coffee right before the next game. They’re very gifted physically. There’s no excuse really for that performance. But, the Southern Miss. offense was shut down very well despite it, so I can’t complain too much. I think it was just an aberration. They’ll get it together.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Sep 3, 2025 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions
We'll see much more blitz packages against UGA, anyways.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 3, 2025 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I noticed they did almost everything on offense.
They even brought in Gilmore, and also ran a reverse with Sanders. They’re just trying to give Georgia more stuff to gameplan for I guess. It takes up some of their practice time.
I’m still concerned about the defensive pressure from the line. If they can’t get it done, they need to start practicing some complex blitzes. I don’t know why a line with Taylor and Matthews can’t get to the quarterback, but whatever. I hope it was just a one game thing.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Sep 3, 2025 2:18 PM EDT reply actions
like gamecock man said
they wasnt holding the ball long at all. I would be willing to bet at least 50% of their plays were screens or little quick slants. Almost no defense would get pressure on a QB with that setup, let alone sacks.
by Gamecockrock on Sep 3, 2025 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions
That's not what I saw, but I'm not going to argue.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Sep 4, 2025 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions
We're both right here. I do think that USM's offensive approach was designed to limit our (supposed) advantage on the rush.
But I also think that you’re right—even if we didn’t get the sacks because of the quick release, I would have liked to see our d-line putting guys on their butts and at least pressuring the QB. I’ll admit that I’m a bit worried about this.
But next week, they should be more amped. And we’ll hopefully have Shaq back, who is going to play Norwood’s role on the outside rush.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 4, 2025 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions
high 5
with the win. Great to get that one.
The Def Pressure will be fine. Don’t worry about that issue. Keep in mind with this game USC D had no nickel coverage with Culliver out. Also depth was a issue. The D will be fine.
USC Gamecocks Sports Analysis and Insight
www.leftoverhotdog.com
by Flounder on Sep 3, 2025 3:24 PM EDT reply actions
Yeah, I'm willing to trust that Johnson will get everything in order. We just need to get some of the key players back.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 3, 2025 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions
The thing is ...
… I think they should’ve been able to get plenty of pressure with just the front four. It is concerning to me. Maybe it’s just me. I don’t think they should have to blitz just to get pressure.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Sep 4, 2025 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't disagree. Against a rookie, mid-major offensive line, you would expect more from a defensive line that is supposed to be elite.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 4, 2025 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions
But at the same time, we've seen plenty of good defense from Johnson and this crew of players. If I'm going to put faith in something getting better, it'll be that D.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 4, 2025 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions
i find it funny how
one game where offense outplays the defense and we seem to think the defense is going to suck. We have been a defensive powerhouse for the last 5-6 years, and only lost 3 key players on defense from last year… the D should be improved upon last year once we get all these problems sorted out. (problems being NCAA)
by Gamecockrock on Sep 5, 2025 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions
and dont forget
alot of the poor play came in the 2nd half… when we was playing 3rd string guys. Plus we was playing against a no huddle offense, which is something we dont face in the SEC.
The important thing here is we only allowed 13 points against an explosive and talented offense that is use to puttin up big numbers and outscoring teams to win.
by Gamecockrock on Sep 5, 2025 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions
In 2006, the Carolina Panthers brought together what many thought was the best defensive line in football.
They had Julius Peppers, Ma’ake Kemoeatu, Kris Jenkins, and Mike Rucker. That year, they tied for 6th in the league in sacks. Going into the 2007 season, everyone thought they would dominate, having one year of playing time with each other under their belts. They put together what was one of the worst performances by a defensive line in franchise history. They were 31st in sacks.
Ever since then, I do not pretend to assume any part of any team will be good simply because they have a history of it. The fact is, the defensive line in that game against Southern Miss. was slow off the snap, played with no aggression or heart, and was almost a no factor in the overall great defensive performance. I’m talking about the first string line in the first half, not once the 2nd or 3rd string defensive backfield came in and started to go soft on coverage, possibly allowing for quicker throws.
I think that defensive line has loads of talent, but I don’t find the concern funny at all. It could’ve easily been a one game fluke. That kind of thing happens at least once a year to some part of the team. We’ll just have to wait and see.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Sep 5, 2025 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions
I have to agree with Gamecock man on this one.
I went back and watched the first half, and on practically every down the USM quarterback got rid of the ball in under 1 second. I don’t care how fast you are, it’s almost impossible to come out of a 3-point stance and sack a quarterback in under a second.
What’s more is we often only brought our front four when USM would have 4, 5, or even 6 blockers held back. I understand your idea that we should be able to get pressure with only our front four, but that’s a little much to expect if USM has 1 or 2 more men than we are bringing.
I was pretty pleased with how our defense played at the time, and after watching the tape I’m even more so. I expect us to get some players back by the Georgia game as well.
Dum spiro spero - "While I breathe, I hope"
State motto of South Carolina
by The Feathered Warrior on Sep 5, 2025 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Also don't forget that when going against a team that favors the short passing game...
You often have your DEs in coverage. Another reason you didn’t see Matthews and Taylor spending a lot of time in the backfield.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
by Gamecock Man on Sep 5, 2025 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions

by Gamecock Man on 












